In his book Serge Lang provides the following proof that every bounded set that is closed is also compact.
" Let S be a closed and bounded set. This implies that there exists $B$ s.t. $|z|\leq B$ where $z\in s$. For all $z$ write $z=x+iy$, then $|x|\leq B$ and $|y| \leq B$.
Let ${z_n}$ be a sequence in $S$, and write $z_n=x_n+iy_n$.
There is a subsequence {$z_{n_1}$} s.t. {${x_{n_1}}$} converges to a real number $a$ and similarly there is a subsequence {${z_{n_2}}$} s.t. {${y_{n_2}}$} converges to a real number $b$.
Then {$z_{n_2}= x_{n_2}+i{y_2}$} converges to $a+ib$ which implies that $S$ is compact."
What I don't understand is two things.
- How does proving {$x_{n_1}$} converges to $a$ prove that {${x_{n_2}}$} converges to $a$ aswell?
- How is it implied that there exist such subsequences such that {${x_{n_1}}$} and {${y_{n_2}}$} converge to these values? Afterall isn't this what we are suppose to prove?
If anybody could shine some light, I will greatly appreciate it.
This is indeed a mistake. You should take a convergent subsequence of $y_{n_1}$ which converges, not just a subsequence of $y_n$. In that case $x_{n_2}$ is a subsequence of $x_{n_1}$ and hence it converges to $a$ as well.
As for your second question, I believe the author assumes you already know that a bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence (the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem), and now he uses it to prove this property holds for complex sequences as well.