Theorem 1: $M$ is a complete enumerable metric space $\Rightarrow$ $M$ has an isolated point.
My teacher proved Theorem 1 this way:
$M = \{x_1,x_2,...,x_n,...\}$.
$M = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \{x_n\}$
Baire theorem imply that $\exists n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\text{int}(\{x_n\}) \neq \emptyset$.
Then, since $\text{int}\{x_n\} = \{ x_n \}$, $\{ x_n\}$ open $\Rightarrow x_n $ isolated.
$ \square$
Why does Baire theorem imply that? If $M$ were meagre then $\text{int(M)} = \emptyset$. Why is that an absurd?
A set $M$ is meagre if $\exists F_n$ closed sets with $\text{int}(F_n) = \emptyset$ and $M \subseteq \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} F_n$.
Baire theorem says $M$ is meagre, then $\text{int}(M) = \emptyset$
Why are the sets $\{x_n\}$ closed?
Please someone explain. Thanks.
The Baire category theorem for complete metric spaces says that every complete metric space is a Baire space; this means that if $X$ is a complete metric space, then $X$ is not the union of countably many meagre subsets. The space $M$ is the union of the countably many singleton sets $\{x_n\}$, and it’s complete, so at least one of the sets $\{x_n\}$ must be non-meagre.
This non-meagre set $\{x_n\}$ is closed because every singleton set $\{x\}$ in a metric space is closed: if you don’t know this already, you should try to prove it. You can do so by showing that if $x\ne y$, then $x\notin\operatorname{cl}\{y\}$. A closed set is meagre if and only if its interior is empty; $\{x_n\}$ is non-meagre, so its interior must be non-empty. The only non-empty subset of $\{x_n\}$ is $\{x_n\}$ itself, so the interior of $\{x_n\}$ must be $\{x_n\}$. Thus, $\{x_n\}$ is an open set, and by definition $x_n$ is an isolated point of $M$.