I seek to find a $c, \beta > 0$ independent of (uniformly bounding) $s, t \in [0,1]$ such that $$\sum_{n=2}^\infty (-1)^n \frac{2^n+1}{n!}|t-s|^n \le c|t-s|^{1+\beta}$$ for all $s, t \in [0,1]$. I know LHS converges for each $s, t$ because $2^n \ll n!$ asymptotically, but I'm not sure how to get a $c, \beta$ that prove the bound for all $s, t$.
2026-04-01 23:04:27.1775084667
Upper bounding simple infinite sum
48 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in INEQUALITY
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Is every finite descending sequence in [0,1] in convex hull of certain points?
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- How to prove that $\pi^{e^{\pi^e}}<e^{\pi^{e^{\pi}}}$
- Proving a small inequality
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Related Questions in UPPER-LOWER-BOUNDS
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- Show that $\frac{1}{k}-\ln\left(\frac{k+1}{k}\right)$ is bounded by $\frac{1}{k^2}$
- Bounding Probability with Large Variance
- Connectivity of random graphs - proof $\frac{logn}{n}$ is threshold
- Natural log integral inequality
- Spectrum of a matrix after applying an element-wise function (e.g. elementwise log)
- Majorization form for a given set of integers in some interval.
- Proving $(λ^d + (1-λ^d)e^{(d-1)s})^{\frac{1}{1-d}}\leq\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty\frac1{n!}λ^{\frac{(d^n-1)d}{d-1}+n}s^ne^{-λs}$
- Upper bound for distribution function of the standard normal distribution
- Show $0 < f'(x) \leqslant \frac{1}{2}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First, see that we can take $|t-s|\to 0$ by simply choosing $c$ to be large enough. That is, $|t-s|^{0.99} < c|t-s|^{0.001}$ for large enough $c$. So we'll work with $|t-s| \to 0$. Now call $x = |t-s|$ for clarity, and see that $$\sum_{n=2}^\infty (-1)^n\frac{2^n+1}{n!}x^n \le \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{2^n+1}{n!}x^n$$ Where now dividing both sides by $x^{1+\beta}$ we seek to prove we can find a $\beta$ such that $$\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{2^n+1}{n!}x^{n-1-\beta} \le c$$ for large enough $c$. Of course, any $|\beta| <1$ gives each term is $x^n$ for $n>0$. Then taking the limit $x \to 0$ at the beginning means that this inequality is clearly true as the left hand sides vanishes asymptotically. Thus we know $|\beta|<1$ suffices for large enough $c$, and we can conclude, as required.