Larson Edwards Falvo - Elementary Linear Algebra
In the following exercises in Section $4.5$ Basis and Dimension, the only set that has cardinality less than the dimension of vector space is the one in #$38$
- I can use the fact that all bases of a vector space with dimension $n$ must have $n$ elements.
- I can also approach as follows:
$$2c_1 = u_1$$ $$c_1-c_2 = u_2$$ $$c_2 = u_3$$
$$\to$$
$$(c_1,c_2) = (\frac{u_1}{2}, u_3)$$
and
$$(c_1,c_2) = (u_2 + u_3, u_3)$$
Thus, there is no unique way to represent a vector in $\mathbb R^3$ using vectors in $S$ i.e. $span(S) \ne \mathbb R^3$
- However, I would like to prove that $S$ does not span $\mathbb R^3$ using row reduction on the coefficient matrix (the matrix consisting of the vectors in $S$).
Main Question #1: How would I do this?
I tried row reducing
$$\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0\\ 1 & -1\\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$$
to
$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$
but I don't know what to do with that. Am I supposed to take the transpose?
\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 1 \end{bmatrix}
It row reduces to
$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1/2\\ 0 & 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$$
What do I do with that?
Actually, in the previous section $4.4$ Spanning Sets and Linear Independence, there are some questions like these:
However, there is no row reduction approach:
except I guess in #$51$ where there's row reduction on the transpose (as I linked above).
For #s $9$ and $19$, I looked up the book to see if there was a similar example. There is but it involves row reduction on the augmented matrix instead of simply coefficient matrix:
Main Question #2: How can #$51$ get away with only the coefficient matrix (albeit on the transpose) but Example 3/6 needs the augmented matrix?
Main Question #3: How if possible to approach #s 9 and 19 using row reduction on coefficient matrix? Otherwise, why can't we use just the coefficient matrix?
For #$9$, I would get $$\begin{bmatrix} -3\\ 5 \end{bmatrix} \to \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}$$
For #$19$, I would get $$\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 4\\ 5 & 6\\ 0 & 3 \end{bmatrix} \to \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & 1\\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$
Where do those get me?







Another way to do this problem is to note that $\{\textbf{e}^1, \textbf{e}^2, \textbf{e}^3\}$ is a basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$ i.e any other basis must have the same cardinality. I think proving that result is easier and helps for future problems.