Valuing items based on odds

43 Views Asked by At

Say I'm buying a pack of cards for $4.

The pack contains 5 cards, though I don't think this really impacts the scenario.

Simple Scenario

In a simple scenario, a pack might have a single type of insert that has 1:2 odds for a 50/50 chance at opening a pack with an insert in it.

In this scenario I would value an insert at $8 because that's how much it would cost me on average to get an insert and I'm valuing the base cards at $0.

Complex Scenario

In the more complex scenario, the pack has the following odds:

Type A) 1:1 - Guaranteed to get one and only one of this type

Type B) 1:3

Type C) 1:5

Type Z) ~ The default base you get if it's not one of the above cards

You will never get 2 of a single type in a pack. It's possible to get types A, B, & C all in a single pack.

QUESTION: What is the value of each type of card?

If I bought 100 packs at $4, I spent $400 and would expect (on average) to have received:

100 Type A cards

33 Type B cards

20 Type C cards

But I don't know how to divide & assign that $400 to these 153 cards as they don't seem like they should have equal weight.

My napkin math says divide total money spent by number of types 400/3 = 133.33

Then divide that by number of cards

133.33/100 = 1.33
133.33/33 = 4.04
133.33/20 = 6.66

Not sure if that seems right though.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

There isn't a unique answer to this question. If $a,b,c$ are the values of types A,B,C, respectively, all that we can say is that $$100a+33b+20c=400\tag1$$ There are infinitely many solutions to this equation. I didn't completely follow the logic behind the method you used, but the way I did it came up with the same answer you did.

I would think that type C is worth $5$ times as much as type A, and type B is worth $3$ times as much, so we would get $$\begin{align}300a&=400\tag2\\ a&=\frac43\approx1.33,\\b&=4\\c&=\frac{20}3\approx6.67\end{align}$$ Note that in $(1)$ I rounded $33.\overline{3}$ off to $33$ as you did, but in deriving $(2)$ I used the true value. That accounts for the slight differences from your values.

Others may find different valuations more appropriate.