I wanted to check my proof if it is correct or not. Using these field axioms:
(i)Trichotomy Property: Exactly one of $x<y$, $y<x$, or $x=y$ hold.
(ii)Transitivity: if $x<y$ and $y<z$ (which we could write in shorthand as $x<y<z$), then $x<z$.
(iii)If $x<y$ then $x+z < y+z$.
(iv) If $x<y$ and $z>0$ then $xz<yz$.
- (A1) Addition is commutative
- (A2) Addition is associative
- (A3) Addition has a neutral element $0$
- (A4) Any element has an additive inverse
- (A5) Multiplication is commutative
- (A6) Multiplication is associative
- (A7) Multiplication has a neutral element $1$
- (A8) Any non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse
- (A9) Multiplication distributes over addition
- Prove that for all $a,\, b,\, c\in\mathbb{R}$, if $a<b$ and $c<0$ then $bc < ac$.
Since $a<b$, by (A4), we have that $$ 0 = a + (-a) < b + (-a) = b - a.$$ Since $b - a > 0$ and $c < 0$, then $c(b-a) < 0$. By (A9), this is equivalent to $cb-ca<0$. By (A3), $$ cb=cb-ca+ca<0+ca=ca.$$ Thus $cb<ca$.
Your proof has a gap. How do you know that $b-a \gt 0 \land c \lt 0 \Rightarrow c(b-a) \lt 0$? I'm not saying you're wrong -- I'm just saying you haven't yet proved it.
Edit to add:
Lemma: If $c \lt 0 \land x \lt y, \text{ then } xc \gt yc$.
Proof: $c+(-c) = 0 \land c \lt 0 \Rightarrow -c \gt 0$. (Use property (iii), adding $-c$ to both sides of the inequality.)
Thus, $-xc \lt -yc$. Add $xc + yc$ to both sides: $yc \lt xc$ and the Lemma is proved.