For a manifold $M$, if we want to speak of "tangent vectors," we often say the tangent bundle $TM$ is the space of tangent vectors. This is sort of an abuse of terminology, I guess you could say, because $TM$ isn't even a vector space. I'm having trouble with this because differential $k$-forms (at least one formulation of them anyway) are multilinear maps from $\Pi^k TM$ to $\mathbb{R}$. But how does multilinearity work if we can't even define addition on $TM$? We can't define diff. forms as maps from $\Pi^k T_pM$ to $\mathbb{R}$ because this is specific of a point $p$ and when $k=1$, this is just a covector. Some people say diff. forms as "covector fields" that map $M$ to $T^*M$, but we usually need forms to "eat" vectors.
Traditionally, "forms" in general are multilinear maps from $V^k$ to $\mathbb{R}$ for a vector space $V$. This is true for every notion of "form" I've come across, so this should be true for differential forms as well.
My question is, can we rigorously define differential forms as multilinear maps from tangent vectors to $\mathbb{R}$?
A covariant tensor field is not a map $TM^{\times k}\to C^\infty(M)$, but instead a map $TM^{\oplus k}\to C^\infty(M)$. The difference is that $$TM^{\times k} =\{((p_1,v_1),\ldots,(p_k,v_k))\mid p_i\in M \mbox{ and } v_i \in T_{p_i}M\mbox{ for all }i\},$$while $$TM^{\oplus k} =\{(p,v_1,\ldots,v_k)\mid p\in M\mbox{ and } v_1,\ldots, v_k\in T_pM\}.$$Multilinearity does not make sense for the product but it makes sense for the direct sum.