When we consider a conservation law $$ q_t + f(q)_x = 0, $$ the Rankine-Hugonoit conditions are given by $$ s(q^+ - q^-) = f(q^+) - f(q^-) . $$ However, how does this change if we are given some quasilinear equation $$ q_t + g(q)q_x = 0, $$ that cannot be written in conservation form? In particular, say I have a system of equations $$ q_t + (q-s)_x = 0 $$ $$ s_t + s(q)_x = 0 $$ The usual derivation of the RH conditions involves integration by parts of the conservation term, but we see that $$ \int (sq)_x dx = [[sq]] = \int sq_x dx + \int qs_x dx , $$ and there is no obvious way to deal with the $\int qs_x dx$ term.
2026-03-27 01:47:49.1774576069
What are the Rankine Hugoniot Jump Conditions for quasilinear equations?
520 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in FLUID-DYNAMICS
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- Partial derivatives and path integrals
- Complex potentials and gradient
- 1D viscous flow upwards against gravity
- Higher order of the convection term approximation
- Show that using Suffix Notation
- Fluid Dynamics Proof
- Conversion of Surface integral to a suitable Volume integral.
Related Questions in HYPERBOLIC-EQUATIONS
- what does mean a zero eigenvalue in a PDE?
- Solution of Burgers' equation
- Canonical form of PDE
- Introduction to characteristic surfaces and bicharacteristics
- Simple calculus
- Uniqueness and domain of dependence for wave equations.
- Goursat Problem Solution
- Method of Characteristics for traffic flow equation
- Lax-Wendroff method for linear advection - Stability analysis
- Help deriving Lax-Wendroff scheme for advection equation $u_t+c(x)u_x = 0$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Shock wave solutions require that we introduce the concept of weak solutions. Then, the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions which link the shock speed $\sigma$ to the jumps of $f$ and $q$ can be derived. However, due to the nonconservative (quasilinear) form of the PDE, the standard notion of weak solution in the sense of distributions does not apply. In facts, the nonconservative product $g(q) q_x$ is the product between a jump discontinuity and a Dirac delta, which isn't a well-defined distribution. For functions of bounded variation, Dal Maso-Le Floch-Murat [1] proposed a notion of weak solution to quasilinear equations, see this post. They derive a generalized Rankine-Hugoniot jump relation of the form $$ \sigma (q^+ - q^-) = \int_0^1 g(\phi(\tau)) \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial \tau} \text d \tau $$ where $\phi: [0,1] \to \Bbb R$ is a Lipschitz path connecting $q^-$ and $q^+$, i.e. $\phi(0) = q^-$ and $\phi(1) = q^+$. For instance, let's consider the linear path $\phi: \tau\mapsto q^- + \tau\, (q^+ - q^-)$. If $g = f'$ is derived from a conservative equation, then the traditional Rankine-Hugoniot relation is recovered.
The same kind of equation can be written for nonconservative systems of the form ${\bf q}_t + {\bf g}({\bf q}){\bf q}_x = {\bf 0}$, where $$ \sigma ({\bf q}^+ - {\bf q}^-) = \int_0^1 {\bf g}({\boldsymbol\phi}(\tau)) \frac{\partial {\boldsymbol \phi}}{\partial \tau} \text d \tau \, . $$ Again, if ${\bf g} = \partial {\bf f}/\partial {\bf q}$ is derived from a conservative formulation with flux $\bf f$, then the above equation recovers the traditional Rankine-Hugoniot jump condition for systems of conservation laws.
[1] G Dal Maso, P Le Floch, F Murat: Definition and weak stability of nonconservative products. J. Math. Pures Appl. 74, 483-548 (1995)