I need to negate the following sentence: "If for the integers $x, y, z$ we know that $x$ divides $y$ and $y$ divides $z$, then $x$ divides $z$."
In this scenario, what does it mean for $x$ to "divide" $y$, et cetera?
I need to negate the following sentence: "If for the integers $x, y, z$ we know that $x$ divides $y$ and $y$ divides $z$, then $x$ divides $z$."
In this scenario, what does it mean for $x$ to "divide" $y$, et cetera?
On
In terms of number theory, let $a,b\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then $a$ divides $b$ if $\exists m\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $am=b$. This is written $a|b$. For example, $7$ is a divisor of $56$ because $7\times 8=56$. This is the algebraic/proper definition for two elements to divide each other. This satisfies the transitive relation \begin{equation*} a|b~\text{and}~b|c\Rightarrow a|c. \end{equation*} Does this help?
On
x divides y means there exists an integer n such that nx=y. So 7 divides 28, since 4*7=28, but 8 does not divide 28, even though outside number theory we would happily deal with the number 3.5.
On
Does it really matter what is the meaning of "$x$ divides $y$"?
This is a binary relation, $D(x,y)$. The statement you need to negate is $\forall x\forall y\forall z(D(x,y)\land D(y,z)\rightarrow D(x,z))$, and negating this statement has nothing to do with its actual content.
In any case, for the integers, $x$ divides $y$ if there exists some integer $k$, such that $x\cdot k=y$. So for example $1$ divides every integer, and every integer divides $0$.
If $x$ divides $y$, $x$ is a factor of $y$, or in other words, $y$ is divisible by $x$.
Of course, the prerequisite is that $x,y\in{\Bbb{Z}}$.
For instance, $3$ divides $15$ because $15=3\cdot5$, $3$ is a factor of $15$.