$\mathrm{Sh}(\mathrm{CRing}_{fp}^{op})$(here $\mathrm{CRing}_{fp}^{op}$ is the opposite category of the category of finitely presented rings) will be the classifying topos of the theory of local rings. My question is: What is $\mathrm{Sh}(\mathrm{CRing}^{op})$ a classifying topos of? Thanks in advance.
2026-04-01 22:46:08.1775083568
What is $\mathrm{Sh}(\mathrm{CRing}^{op})$ a classifying topos of?
179 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in TOPOS-THEORY
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- (From Awodey) Find the subobject classifier for $\sf Sets^{P}$ for a poset $\sf P$
- Cardinal collapse and (higher) toposes
- Geometric interpretation of Lawvere-Tierney topology
- Can 2 different coverages *on the same category* yield the same sheaf topos?
- Is there a classifying topos for schemes?
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Classifying topos of a topological group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I find that talking about universes (plural!) confuses people who don't already know how to handle them, so I won't use that concept here. Instead I will talk about small categories of rings in general.
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be any small full subcategory of $\textbf{CRing}^\textrm{op}$ with the following properties:
$\mathbb{Z}$ is in in $\mathcal{A}$.
Given ring homomorphisms $A \to B$ and $A \to C$, if $A$, $B$, and $C$ are in $\mathcal{A}$, then the pushout $B \otimes_A C$ is also in $\mathcal{A}$.
If $A$ is an object in $\mathcal{A}$, then the polynomial ring $A [x]$ is also in $\mathcal{A}$.
Example. The skeleton of the opposite of the category of finitely presented rings satisfies the above hypotheses.
Proposition. Let $X : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$ be a functor that preserves finite limits. For each object $A$ in $\mathcal{A}$, we have an $A$-algebra $O (A)$ in $\mathcal{E}_{/ X (A)}$, where:
The underlying object of $O (A)$ is given by the morphism $X (A [x]) \to X (A)$ in $\mathcal{E}$ induced by the canonical $A$-algebra homomorphism $A \to A [x]$.
For each $a \in A$, the constant $a$ of $O (A)$ is given by the morphism $X (A) \to X (A [x])$ in $\mathcal{E}$ induced by the $A$-algebra homomorphism $A [x] \to A$ sending $x$ to $a$.
The addition (resp. multiplication) of $O (A)$ is given by the morphism $X (A [x_0, x_1]) \to X (A [x])$ in $\mathcal{E}$ induced by the $A$-algebra homomorphism $A [x] \to A [x_0, x_1]$ sending $x$ to $x_0 + x_1$ (resp. $x_0 x_1$).
Furthermore, for each ring homomorphism $A \to B$ where $A$ and $B$ are in $\mathcal{A}$, we get an $A$-algebra homomorphism $O (B) \to X (B) \times_{X (A)} O (A)$ in $\mathcal{E}_{/ X (B)}$, where the $A$-algebra structure on $O (B)$ is the one induced by the given ring homomorphism $A \to B$. This action is functorial in the appropriate sense.
The proposition justifies the following:
Definition. An $\mathcal{A}$-algebra in a Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is a functor $\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$ that preserves finite limits.
Remark. Note that $X (\mathbb{Z}) \cong 1$, so $\mathcal{E}_{/ X (\mathbb{Z})}$ is equivalent to $\mathcal{E}$ itself and $O (\mathbb{Z})$ is just a ring in $\mathcal{E}$.
Example. The Yoneda embedding $Y : \mathcal{A} \to [\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$ preserves finite limits, so it is an $\mathcal{A}$-algebra in the presheaf topos $[\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$.
In fact:
Proposition. The Yoneda embedding $Y : \mathcal{A} \to [\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$, considered as an $\mathcal{A}$-algebra, is universal in the sense that for every $\mathcal{A}$-algebra $X : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$, there is a geometric morphism $f : \mathcal{E} \to [\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$ such that $f^* Y \cong X$, and these are unique up to unique isomorphism in the appropriate sense. That is, the presheaf topos $[\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$ classifies $\mathcal{A}$-algebras.
Definition. A local $\mathcal{A}$-algebra in a Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is a functor $X : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$ with the following properties:
$X$ preserves finite limits. (So $X$ is an $\mathcal{A}$-algebra, as defined previously.)
For every object $A$ in $\mathcal{A}$ and every finite list of elements $a_0, \ldots, a_{n-1}$ in $A$ such that $a_0 + \cdots + a_{n-1} = 1$, the induced morphisms $X (A [a_0{}^{-1}]) \to X (A), \ldots, X (A [a_{n-1}{}^{-1}]) \to X (A)$ are jointly epimorphic in $\mathcal{E}$.
Proposition. Let $X : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$ be an $\mathcal{A}$-algebra and let $O (A)$ be $X (A [x])$ considered as an $A$-algebra in $\mathcal{E}_{/ X (A)}$. The following are equivalent:
$X : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{E}$ is a local $\mathcal{A}$-algebra.
$O (\mathbb{Z})$ is a local ring in $\mathcal{E}$, i.e. the morphisms $X (\mathbb{Z} [x, x^{-1}]) \to X (\mathbb{Z} [x])$ and $X (\mathbb{Z} [x, (1 - x)^{-1}]) \to X (\mathbb{Z} [x])$ are jointly epimorphic in $\mathcal{E}$.
For every object $A$ in $\mathcal{A}$, $O (A)$ is a local ring in $\mathcal{E}_{/ X (A)}$.
The geometric morphism $\mathcal{E} \to [\mathcal{A}^\textrm{op}, \textbf{Set}]$ classifying $X$ factors through the subtopos of Zariski sheaves on $\mathcal{A}$.
Thus:
Theorem. The topos of Zariski sheaves on $\mathcal{A}$ classifies local $\mathcal{A}$-algebras.