I'm reading a book (Linear and Geometric Algebra, by Alan Macdonald) where the author uses the term grade without ever defining it. I have a murky sense of what the grade of a blade may be (a geometric product of k orthogonal vectors is called a blade of grade k), but I have no idea of what the grade of a general multivector is. Does grade apply only to blades? If not, what is the definition of grade?
2026-03-26 04:52:37.1774500757
What is the "grade" in geometric algebra
1.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
The short answer
No, a general multivector is not graded. Only a portion of the elements of the algebra are assigned grades. Yes blades are among the elements assigned grades. A blade represents a subspace of $V$, and the grade of that blade is the dimension of the subspace the blade represents.
Everything I'm about to say is with regards to an $n$ dimensional quadratic space $V$ with a nondegenerate form.
Hopefully you are familiar with the construction where an orthonormal basis $\{e_i\mid 1\leq i\leq n\}$ for $V$ is used to construct a basis for the Clifford algebra.
The basis for the Clifford algebra is made up from these sets:
$S_0=\{1\}$
$S_1=\{e_i\mid 1\leq i\leq n\}$
$S_2=\{e_ie_j\mid 1\leq i< j\leq n \}$
$S_3=\{e_ie_je_k\mid 1\leq i< j<k\leq n \}$
...
$S_n=\{e_1e_2\cdots e_n\}$
The basis for the Clifford algebra we are talking about is $\cup_{j=1}^n S_j$.
What a grade is:
It isn't hard to show that any product of $k$ vectors (vectors, elements of $V$ lie in $\langle S_1 \rangle$) lies in $\langle S_k\rangle$. It turns out that the product is zero exactly when the set of vectors you are multiplying is linearly dependent. Blades, being products like this, do always have a grade.
What grade roughly means:
For a blade $b_1\cdots b_k$ of $k$ vectors from $V$ made up of linearly independent vectors $b_i$", you get an element of grade $k$. Since this element is usually interpreted as "the subspace of $V$ generated by the $b_i$, you can see that the grade is coinciding with the dimension of this subspace.
When the vectors are not LI, things are different. Had the $b_i$ been linearly dependent, the product $b_1\cdots b_k$ would be zero, but the dimension of the span of the $b_i$ could be anything less than $k$, so you can see why there are problems assigning 0 a fixed grade to make the system of "grade is the same as dimension of span" work universally.
The interesting thing is that multiplication plays well with grades. I think the path most often taken is to just define the grade of 0 to be 0, and then declare "the product of a grade $k$ vector with a grade $j$ vector has grade $j+k$ or grade $0$ according to whether the product is zero or not."