Found it to be ∃x∀yP(x,y).
Is this right?
Here's one possible way of reasoning, passing the $\lnot$ through the quantors:
$\lnot\forall x: \exists y:\lnot P(x,y) ~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x: \lnot\exists y: \lnot P(x, y) ~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x : \forall y : \lnot\lnot P(x, y)~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x : \forall y : P(x,y)$
Yes, the answer you gave is right.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Here's one possible way of reasoning, passing the $\lnot$ through the quantors:
$\lnot\forall x: \exists y:\lnot P(x,y) ~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x: \lnot\exists y: \lnot P(x, y) ~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x : \forall y : \lnot\lnot P(x, y)~\Leftrightarrow~ \exists x : \forall y : P(x,y)$