As we all know, $\mathbb{N}$ contains infinitely many numbers. What is the probability of guessing the right number $n \in \mathbb{N}$, i. e. what is $\frac{1}{\infty}$? It is clear that there is a chance of guessing the right number but it is very unlikely.
2026-04-07 22:59:02.1775602742
What is the probability of guessing the right number $n$ from all numbers $\mathbb{N}$?
724 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in INFINITY
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- No two sided limit exists
- Are these formulations correct?
- Are these numbers different from each other?
- What is wrong in my analysis?
- Where does $x$ belong to?
- Divide by zero on Android
- Why is the set of all infinite binary sequences uncountable but the set of all natural numbers are countable?
- Is a set infinite if there exists a bijection between the topological space X and the set?
- Infinitesimal Values
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
"It is clear that there is a chance of guessing the right number" It becomes less clear the more you think about it. Can you imagine any kind of physical process which could, even in principle, return any natural number with positive probability (let alone equal probability)?
This is an example of why mathematicians have resorted to reasoning axiomatically when it comes to the infinite: intuition is often not up to the task. In this case it is easy to see that it is impossible to set things up in a coherent, nontrivial way. Namely:
Suppose we want to assign a non-negative "probability" to every subset $S$ of $\mathbb{N}$. What properties do we want? Surely at least the following:
$\bullet$ for all subsets $X$ of $\mathbb{N}$, $0 \leq P(X) \leq 1$.
$\bullet$ For all $x,y \in \mathbb{N}$, $P(\{x\}) = P(\{y\})$.
$\bullet$ For any disjoint subsets $X$ and $Y$, $P(X \cup Y) = P(X) + P(Y)$.
From these we quickly deduce that for every finite subset $X$ of $\mathbb{N}$, $P(X) = 0$. Namely, suppose $P(\{1\}) = \alpha > 0$. There is some natural number $n$ such that $\frac{1}{n} < \alpha$, and then $P( \{1,\ldots,n\}) = n \alpha > 1$: oops!
Decreeing that every finite set has probability zero is thus far consistent but not a very interesting answer (at least not if you only care about finite sets!). Moreover, note how little we asked for: in modern mathematics to speak of "probabilities" at all one usually requires also
$\bullet$ $P(\mathbb{N}) = 1$.
$\bullet$ If $\{X_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a sequence of pairwise disjoint subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ then $P(\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} X_n) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} P(X_n)$.
But now these axioms are strictly contradictory: we get
$1 = P(\mathbb{N}) = P( \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} \{n\}) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} P(\{n\}) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} 0 = 0$.
Note: in view of the above, something's gotta give. From a mathematical perspective the best thing to do is throw away the second axiom that all singleton sets arise with equal probability. Thus you can endow the natural numbers with a perfectly good "probability measure" by choosing an infinite sequence $p_n$ of non-negative real numbers with $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} p_n = 1$ -- e.g. we could take $p_n = \frac{1}{2^n}$. Then for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ we put $P(\{n\}) = p_n$, and for any subset $S \subset \mathbb{N}$ we put $P(S) = \sum_{n \in S} P(\{n\})$. Such "discrete probability measures" can be quite useful in mathematics...but they do not formalize the romantic allure of picking a positive integer at random.