What is wrong with this procedure-writing Angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates

85 Views Asked by At

I am trying to write the first component of the quantum angular momentum operator $L_1$ in spherical coordinates. $$L_1=x_2p_3-x_3p_2=-i\hbar (x_2\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_3}-x_3\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_2})=$$

The defining equations of the spherical coordinates are: $x_1=r \sin\theta \cos\varphi,x_2=r\sin\theta\sin\varphi, x_3=r\cos\theta\tag{1}$ Then using the chain rule:

\begin{align} L_1 &=-i\hbar (x_2\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_3}-x_3\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_2})\\ &=-i\hbar \Big[r\sin\theta\sin\varphi\left( \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial x_3}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial r} +\dfrac{\partial \theta}{\partial x_3}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} +\dfrac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_3}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}\right)\\ &\qquad\qquad\; -r\cos\theta\ \left( \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial x_2}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial r} +\dfrac{\partial \theta}{\partial x_2}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} +\dfrac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_2}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \varphi}\right) \Big] \tag{2} \end{align}

Using (1):

$\dfrac {\partial r}{\partial x_3}=\dfrac {1}{\frac{\partial x_3}{\partial r}}=\dfrac {1}{\cos \theta}$

$\dfrac {\partial \theta}{\partial x_3}=\dfrac {1}{\frac{\partial x_3}{\partial \theta}}=\dfrac {-1}{r \sin \theta}$

$\dfrac {\partial \varphi}{\partial x_3}=0$

$\dfrac {\partial r}{\partial x_2}=\dfrac {1}{\frac{\partial x_2}{\partial r}}=\dfrac {1}{\sin \theta \sin \varphi}$

$\dfrac {\partial \theta}{\partial x_2}=\dfrac {1}{\frac{\partial x_2}{\partial \theta}}=\dfrac {1}{r \cos \theta \sin \varphi}$

$\dfrac {\partial \varphi}{\partial x_2}=\dfrac {1}{\frac{\partial x_2}{\partial \varphi}}=\dfrac {1}{r \sin \theta \cos \varphi}$

Plugging these results in (2): $$L_1=-i\hbar [r\tan\theta\sin\varphi \dfrac{\partial}{\partial r} -\sin \varphi\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} -r \dfrac{\cot\theta}{\sin \varphi}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial r} -\dfrac{1}{\sin \varphi}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} -\dfrac{\cot \theta}{ \cos \varphi}\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \varphi} ] \tag{3}$$

But the result should be $$L_1=+i\hbar [\sin \varphi\dfrac{\partial}{\partial \theta} +\cos \varphi \cot \theta \dfrac{\partial}{\partial \varphi} ] \tag{4}$$

What am I doing wrong?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

15
On BEST ANSWER

When enough variables are involved, partial derivatives need a disambiguation as to what is held constant in their definition, e.g. $\left(\tfrac{\partial u}{\partial v}\right)_w$ holds $w$ constant. In particular, $\left(\tfrac{\partial u}{\partial v}\right)\left(\tfrac{\partial v}{\partial u}\right)\ne1$ when we use different conventions in these derivatives.

A simpler version of your mistake is found in planar polar coordinates with $4$ variables $x,\,y,\,r,\,\theta$. For example, compare$$\left(\tfrac{\partial x}{\partial r}\right)_\theta=\left(\tfrac{\partial r\cos\theta}{\partial r}\right)_\theta=\cos\theta=\tfrac{x}{r}$$with$$\left(\tfrac{\partial r}{\partial x}\right)_y=\left(\tfrac{\partial\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{\partial x}\right)_y=\tfrac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}=\tfrac{x}{r}.$$These aren't reciprocals; in fact, they're equal. (Physics has another famous example of what you'd think would be reciprocals in fact being equal; it's the basis of a lot of relativity "paradoxes".)

The triple product rule is another important example of such "gotchas". If $f(x,\,y,\,z)=0$ then$$\prod_\text{cyc}\left(\tfrac{\partial x}{\partial y}\right)_z=-1$$(note the minus sign).