As I understand it, Itô processes are those semi-martingales whose finite variation part is an integral (against Lebesgue measure) and whose (continuous local) martingale part is a stochastic integral against a Brownian motion. But I thought all (continuous local) martingales could be written as integrals against a Brownian motion, which would mean the only thing that distinguishes an Itô process among the semi-martingales is that its finite variation part is absolutely continuous. What am I missing?
2026-03-31 22:22:15.1774995735
What makes Itô processes special?
88 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in MATH-HISTORY
- Are there negative prime numbers?
- University math curriculum focused on (or inclusive of) "great historical works" of math?
- Did Grothendieck acknowledge his collaborators' intellectual contributions?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
- What about the 'geometry' in 'geometric progression'?
- Discovery of the first Janko Group
- Has miscommunication ever benefited mathematics? Let's list examples.
- Neumann Theorem about finite unions of cosets
- What is Euler doing?
- A book that shows history of mathematics and how ideas were formed?
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-ANALYSIS
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
- Solution of an HJB equation in continuous time
- Initial Distribution of Stochastic Differential Equations
- Infinitesimal generator of $3$-dimensional Stochastic differential equation
- On the continuity of Gaussian processes on the interval [0,1] depending on the continuity of the covariance function
- Joint Markov property of a Markov chain and its integral against Brownian Motion
- How can a martingale be a density process?
- Show that for a continuous Gaussian martingale process $M$ that $\langle M, M \rangle_t = f(t)$ is continuous, monotone, and nondecreasing
- Laplace transform of hitting time of Brownian motion with drift
- Is the solution to this (simple) Stochastic Differential Equation unique?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To write a continuous local martingale as integral of a BM its filtration needs to be that of the BM we want to represent it with. That is an enormous restriction. See George Lowther's blog. The reason why Ito processes came to be is historical. At the time they were born semi martingales were not yet known. K. Ito choose the most natural definition of the time to build his theory on. Note that the condition on the filtration is more important than the continuity of the martingale. The latter follows automatically from that representation theorem.
For the sake of completeness I also mention another representation theorem which assumes that the martingale is continuous. Then, its filtration does not have to be Brownian. It can be enlarged to allow for a BM that represents the martingale as stochastic integral. See Karatzas & Shreve section 3.4.
Semimartingales were invented in the 1960ies by the Strasbourg school around P.A. Meyer and C. Dellacherie. That was a period of strong formalization not unlike what the Bourbaki group had done in other mathematical fields.