Is there a current "gold standard" proof of the Poincaré Conjecture? I am interested in reading through the full proof, and some day perhaps reading Perelman's proof/notes. For now, though, I was wondering what the most "polished" version is, which would represent any advances during the 17 years since his publications and the 14 years since the formalization by various groups. I can see that Terry Tao has published some notes recently, but I don't believe he has published a full proof.
2026-04-06 04:56:37.1775451397
What's the best current proof of the Poincaré conjecture?
537 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in MATH-HISTORY
- Are there negative prime numbers?
- University math curriculum focused on (or inclusive of) "great historical works" of math?
- Did Grothendieck acknowledge his collaborators' intellectual contributions?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
- What about the 'geometry' in 'geometric progression'?
- Discovery of the first Janko Group
- Has miscommunication ever benefited mathematics? Let's list examples.
- Neumann Theorem about finite unions of cosets
- What is Euler doing?
- A book that shows history of mathematics and how ideas were formed?
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Still, the only (essentially) self-contained treatment of Perelman's proof of the Poincare Conjecture is
Morgan, John; Tian, Gang, Ricci flow and the Poincaré conjecture, Clay Mathematics Monographs 3. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS); Cambridge, MA: Clay Mathematics Institute (ISBN 978-0-8218-4328-4/hbk). xlii, 521 p. (2007). ZBL1179.57045.
The only major part of the proof which they only sketch but do not provide details of is the short-time existence theorem for RF. One thing they do not address is the equivalence between the topological and smooth category for 3-dimensional manifolds, but, as long as one is only interested in classifying smooth manifolds up to diffeomorphism, this does not matter.
Since then, there were numerous advances in understanding Ricci Flow in dimension 3 as well as in higher dimensions, but these did not lead to a substantial simplification of the proof. Needless to say, I do not recommend reading either the above book or other accounts of the proof of the 3-dimensional Poincare Conjecture (and, more generally, the Geometrization Conjecture) to an undergraduate student. My suggestion instead would be to read a textbook on Differential (Riemannian) Geometry.