I ran across this equation...
$\sqrt {2x+6}+4=x+3$
Without thinking, I solved for x in the following way:
$\sqrt {2x+6}+4=x+3$
Subtract 4 from both sides.
$\sqrt {2x+6}=x-1$
Square each side.
$2x+6=(x-1)^2$
"FOIL" and rearrange.
$ x^2-4x-5=0 $
Factor.
$(x+1)(x-5)=0$
If you plot the functions you can very clearly see there is only one solution, x=5, which of course stems from the fact that the radical is does not have the plus/minus sign so only half of the "parabola" is considered. But my problem with this is that it should be possible to show algebraically that there is only one solution (other than plugging the numbers in and checking). My thinking is that there is some logical mistake in the way I solved for x, but I can't find it. Moreover, there are of course equations that do intersect twice ($\sqrt {4x+6}+1=x+3$ at $x=\sqrt 2 , -\sqrt 2$ for example), and the exact same steps work in that case.
Any thoughts as to what the differences are between the two cases would be appreciated.
"$\sqrt{2x +6}=x-1$" is true if and only if "2x+6=(x-1)^2 AND $x\geq 1$".
Basically when we do math there are "if and only if" steps where each statement is logically equivalent to the next statement, and there "implies" steps where one statement implies the next statement but not the converse. When you square both sides of an equality, then you are doing an "implies" step.
If you always use "if and only if" steps, then you will be able to conclude that $x=5$ without checking cases.
Here is how we do the proof using only "if and only if" steps.
Proof: The following are equivalent: