Consider the two equations:
$\dfrac{3}{2}\sqrt 2\approx \dfrac{543}{256}$ and $\dfrac{3}{\sqrt 2} \approx \dfrac{543}{256}$
The left-hand sides of both are equivalent so it seems like they should yield the same value when approximating $\sqrt 2$.
For the first equation: $$\sqrt 2 \approx \dfrac{543}{256} \cdot \dfrac{2}{3} = \dfrac{181}{128}$$
For the second equation: $\sqrt 2 \approx 3 \cdot \dfrac{256}{543}= \dfrac{256}{181}$
The results are close in value but not the same.
Why do these methods give different results?
Think of this problem from a perspective of error propagation. We can formulate two equations
$$f(\varepsilon)=\sqrt{2} = \dfrac{2}{3} \dfrac{543}{256} + \varepsilon$$ $$g(\varepsilon)=\sqrt{2} = \dfrac{3}{\dfrac{543}{256} + \varepsilon}$$
The sensitivity of with respect to changes in $\varepsilon$ is given by
$$\Delta f \approx \Delta\varepsilon$$ $$\Delta g \approx \dfrac{3}{\left[\dfrac{543}{256} + \varepsilon\right]^2}\Delta \varepsilon.$$
As you can see the first expression scales linearly with $\Delta \varepsilon$. The second equation does not scale linearly. Hence, we have different behaviors.