Why does a lack of inversion symmetry in 2D pattern formation lead to hexagons?

51 Views Asked by At

In reaction diffusion based pattern formation (or other types of pattern formation too, really), it seems that the absence of an inversion symmetry (i.e., if the field $u(x,t)$ is a stable solution/steady state, then $-u(x,t)$ is not) leads to hexagonal pattern formation (rather than stripes or squares). This can be seen, for example, in the references 1, 2, 3, 4,5 and several other sources.

However, I am unable to come up with a simple mathematical explanation, or intuitive reason for this; and the explanations in the above references seem to be quite detailed or scenario specific. Why does a lack of inversion symmetry generally lead to hexagons in pattern formation?