I am currently learning about differential equations, and one method that we use to solve systems of homogenous systems of differential equations is to put the coefficients into a matrix, set the matrix equal to the zero vector, then find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. I cannot find proof of this method anywhere and I've looked many times. This method is really stumping me :/
2026-03-27 20:54:05.1774644845
Why does finding eigenvalues of a system of differential equations always return the solution?
503 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- The Equation of Motion of a Snowball
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Directional continuous derivative on vectors of a base implies differentiability in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Need explanation for intuition behind rewriting $dy$ in terms of $dx$
- Does the double integrative of d^{2}x make sense from a mathematical point of view?
- Functional with 4th grade characteristic equation
- need to equate MATLAB and MATHEMATICA solutions
- Formula for Curvature
- Showing that $\Psi(f) = \int^{b}_{a}\phi(f(x))dx$ is differentiable.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For $x'=Ax$ for a constant coefficient matrix $A$, we look for exponential solutions. It is basically just a guess, though it is motivated by what we already know about the scalar case. When we do that, we find that the exponential solutions are of the form $x_k(t)=e^{\lambda_k t} v_k$ where $v_k$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $\lambda_k$.
For a system of $n$ first order differential equations, you will have $n$ linearly independent solutions. This is essentially a consequence of the fact that the solution to the IVP is unique and is determined by the $n$ scalar parameters $x_1(t_0),\dots,x_n(t_0)$.
Now in linear algebra it turns out that "almost every" square matrix is diagonalizable (if we allow for complex eigenvalues), which means that it has $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors. In this case any solution can be represented as a combination of exponential solutions. So if you choose $A$ "at random" then you can solve $x'=Ax$ with exponential solutions only. Indeed in this case if $A=PDP^{-1}$ for a diagonal $D$ then $x(t)=e^{At} x(0)=Pe^{Dt} P^{-1} x(0)$, where $e^{Dt}$ is just the matrix with $e^{\lambda_k t}$ as its diagonal elements.
In general, however, not every matrix is diagonalizable. But still the formula $x(t)=e^{At} x(0)$ holds, so to handle the general case we just need a way to calculate the matrix exponential. It turns out that although not every square matrix is diagonalizable, every square matrix does have a Jordan normal form. And one can explicitly compute the matrix exponential of a nondiagonal Jordan normal form. For example, $\exp \left (\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} t \right ) = \begin{bmatrix} e^t & te^t \\ 0 & e^t \end{bmatrix}$. Thus one can at least in principle solve any system of the form $x'=Ax$ by using the eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors as well.