I've encountered the fact in the title in a proof for the Borel–Cantelli lemma. Sure, it seems true, but can someone shed some light as to how to formally prove such a claim? (Rather then claim "obviously, we have..." as was done in the text).
2026-04-12 09:32:43.1775986363
Why does $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{P}\left(A_{i}\right)<\infty$ imply $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=n}^{\infty}\mathbb{P}\left(A_{i}\right)=0$?
49 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
We can rewrite the sum as,
$$\sum\limits_{i=n}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i)-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1}\mathbb{P}(A_i)$$
and now take the limit as $n\rightarrow\infty$ on both sides,
$$\implies \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum\limits_{i=n}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i)-\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1}\mathbb{P}(A_i)$$
and notice that $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1}\mathbb{P}(A_i) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{\infty}\mathbb{P}(A_i)$ to get,
$$\implies \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum\limits_{i=n}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i) = 0$$
since $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum\limits_{i=1}^\infty\mathbb{P}(A_i)<\infty$