Why is the curl considered the differential operator in 3-space instead of the gradient? It would seem that the gradient is the corollary to the derivative in 2-space when extending to 3-space. This is mostly w/r/t Stokes' theorem and how the fundamental theorem of calculus seems to extend to 3-space in a not so intuitive way to me.
2026-03-25 20:35:44.1774470944
Why is curl considered the differential operator in 3-space?
131 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- The Equation of Motion of a Snowball
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Directional continuous derivative on vectors of a base implies differentiability in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Need explanation for intuition behind rewriting $dy$ in terms of $dx$
- Does the double integrative of d^{2}x make sense from a mathematical point of view?
- Functional with 4th grade characteristic equation
- need to equate MATLAB and MATHEMATICA solutions
- Formula for Curvature
- Showing that $\Psi(f) = \int^{b}_{a}\phi(f(x))dx$ is differentiable.
Related Questions in STOKES-THEOREM
- Stoke's Theorem on cylinder-plane intersection.
- Integration of one-form
- First part Spivak's proof of Stokes' theorem
- Stokes theorem, how to parametrize in the right direction?
- Surface to choose for the Stokes' theorem for intersection of sphere and plane.
- What is wrong with this vector integral?
- Circulation of a vector field through a cylinder inside a sphere.
- Stokes Theorem Equivalence
- Verify Stokes Theorem vector field $\vec{F} = (y, −x, xyz)$
- Evaluate $\iint \text{curl} (y\,\mathbf{i}+2\,\mathbf{j})\cdot n\; d\sigma$ using Stokes Theorem
Related Questions in CURL
- Why is $\oint_{C_{r_{0}}} \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{r}' \mathrm ds$ called the circulation of the flow around $C_{r_{0}}$?
- How to find $\vec{v}$ if I know $\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{v}$ and $\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{v}$?
- Curl of gradient is not zero
- What are the Effects of Applying the $\nabla$ Operator to a Scalar Field?
- Curl of a Curl of a Vector field Question
- Is this animation of the right hand rule for curl correct?
- Curl of $({\bf b}\cdot{\bf r}){\bf b}$?
- Rotation of a curl?
- How can one get rid of a scalar potential, and find the corresponding vector potential?
- Curl and Conservative relationship specifically for the unit radial vector field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There exists a grand generalization and universal framework encompassing all of vector analysis in all dimensions $n\geq1$. In this realm there is indeed one single differential operator, which is denoted by $d$. The various integral theorems you have met, e.g., $$f(b)-f(a)=\int_a^b f'(t)\>dt\ ,$$ then appear as corollaries to a single formula, namely $$\int_{\partial M}\omega =\int_Md\omega\ .$$ Now this general theory is less intuitive than the vector analysis we learn in advanced calculus or physics classes. In the environment taught in these classes we find all sorts of fields: scalar fields, force fields, flow fields, densities, and for all of these we have differential operators which we can interpret geometrically or physically in an intuitive way. In this view of things the operators $\nabla$, ${\rm curl}$, ${\rm div}$, as well as $\Delta$, are all standing on an equal footing, and there is no question of ${\rm curl}$ being "the" differential operator in 3-space.