Why is $\frac{\partial \bar f }{\partial z} = 0$ for an analytic function $f$?
I understand that, for an analytic function $f, \frac{\partial f }{\partial \bar z} = 0$, but I do not get why the above is true. How can one justify "flipping" the complex conjugate sign (and also without actually defining $\frac{\partial \bar f }{\partial z}$ to be $\overline{\frac{\partial f }{\partial \bar z}}$)?
I get that $\frac{\partial \bar f }{\partial z} = \frac 12 (\frac{\partial \bar f }{\partial x} - i \frac{\partial \bar f }{\partial y})$, but I am not sure how this is related to Cauchy-Riemann equations.
So first let's write the CR equations with $f = u+iv$. $$ u_x = v_y $$ $$ -u_y = v_x $$ Then, as you noted in your last line, $$ \frac{\partial \bar{f}}{\partial z} \sim \frac{\partial \bar{f}}{\partial x} - i\frac{\partial \bar{f}}{\partial y} $$ dropping the constant factor because we want to show this is $0$ anyway. Substituting for our functions $u$ and $v$, we have \begin{gather*} \frac{\partial \bar{f}}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[u-iv\Big]-i\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\Big[u-iv\Big] \\ = u_x-iv_x-i\big(u_y-iv_y\big)\\ = u_x-v_y - i(v_x + u_y) \end{gather*} This expression is $0$ by CR equations.