Let $P$ and $Q$ be functions of $r$ and $r$ be a function of $(x,y,z)$. Also let $f$ be a function of $(x,y)$.
If: $$P(x,y,z) + f (x,y)= Q(x,y,z) \tag{1} $$ By $(1)$ $$\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial x} \neq \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial x} \Rightarrow \dfrac{dP}{dr} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial x} \neq \dfrac{dQ}{dr} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial x}\Rightarrow \dfrac{dP}{dr} \neq \dfrac{dQ}{dr} \tag{2} $$ Also by $(1)$ $$\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial z} = \dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial z}\Rightarrow \dfrac{dP}{dr} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial z} = \dfrac{dQ}{dr} \dfrac{\partial r}{\partial z} \Rightarrow \dfrac{dP}{dr} = \dfrac{dQ}{dr} \tag{3}$$
$(2)$ and $(3)$ contradict. Why is this so?
You say that: $\qquad P(r(x,y,z))+f(x,y)=Q(r(x,y,z))$
Which is to say: $\quad f(x,y)=[Q-P]\circ r(x,y,z)$
Therefore $\qquad\quad~~ 0~{= \dfrac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial z}\\=\left[\dfrac{\mathsf d [Q-P](r)}{\mathsf dr\qquad\qquad}\right]\!\!(x,y,z)\cdot\dfrac{\partial r(x,y,z)}{\partial z\qquad\quad}}$
So either $\dfrac{\mathsf d [Q-P](r)}{\mathsf dr\qquad\qquad}=0$ or $\dfrac{\partial r(x,y,z)}{\partial z\qquad\quad} =0$
In the first case, $f(x,y)$ must be a constant, and in the second $r$ is invariant with respect to $z$. In either case, there is no contradiction involved.
If $f(x,y)$ is constant, then $\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial x}+0=\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial x}$.
If $\dfrac{\partial r(x,y,z)}{\partial z\qquad\quad}=0$ then $\dfrac{\partial P}{\partial z}=\dfrac{\partial Q}{\partial z}=0$.