Why is $\langle x-P(x),m\rangle=0$?

67 Views Asked by At

Let $H$ be a Hilbert space, and let $M\le H$ be a subspace of it.

Let $P:H\rightarrow M$ be the orthogonal projection $H$ onto $M$.

We'll take $x\in H$, and $m \in M$.

By the definition I know $d(x,M)=d(x,P(x))$. (where $d$ is the induced metric).

Is it true that $\langle x-P(x),m\rangle=0$? And why?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

It is true. It follows the condition of optimality for optimization problem.

Proof:

Consider $F(y) = \left<x-y,x-y\right>$. The problem $$ F(y)\to\min,\ y\in M $$ has a unique solution, $P(x)$. Since $F$ is a convex function and $M$ is a convex set, then the following holds: $$ \left<\nabla F(P(x)), v - P(x)\right> \geqslant 0\text{ for all }v\in M. $$ Obviously, $\nabla F(y) = 2(y-x)$. Then for any $m\in M$ we can select $v = P(x)+m$ ($v\in M$ because $M$ is subsapce), then $$ \left<P(x)-x,m \right> \geqslant 0. $$ Selecting now $v = P(x)-m$, we obtain $$ \left<P(x)-x,m \right> \leqslant 0. $$ Hence, $\left<P(x)-x,m \right> =0$ for any $m\in M$.