I understand that topologically a Torus, $S^1 \times S^1$ is very different from a 2-Sphere, $S^2$.
My question is more specifically aimed at understand the meaning of $\times$ that is use $S^1 \times S^1$.
- What is this $\times$ called in mathematics and what are its properties?
I am familiar with Cartesian Product as in $\mathbb{R}^2=\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}$, which is just a tuple in coordinate representation (which is what I understand). But the above encounters seems to suggest that my understanding is incorrect/ partial.
- So, what exactly am I missing?
Abstractly, the product $\times$ for topological spaces is defined as follows:
This definition carries over to other categories too, like sets (swap "continuous function" with "function"), groups (swap "continuous function" with "homomorphism"), vector spaces (swap "continuous function" with "linear transformation"), and so on. That's the beauty of abstract definitions. The downside is that it is, well, abstract. That kind of definition takes some real work to get used to.
However, we can also construct the product more concretely. The topological space $X\times Y$ has the set of all pairs $\{(x,y)\mid x\in X, y\in Y\}$ as its points. The topology is given by a basis of "rectangles"; any set of the form $U\times V=\{(u,v)\mid u\in U, v\in V\}$ where $U\subseteq X$ and $V\subseteq Y$ are open (we can also restrict ourselves to $U,V$ being elements of some basis for the topologies of $X$ and $Y$ rather than general open sets) (these sets are in fact actual rectangles in the case of $\Bbb R\times\Bbb R$ when $U,V$ are open intervals).
This is a construction you have to use a few times to get used to, but it's nowhere as tough as the abstract definition. Many other categories, like the ones mentioned above, use the same base set for their product. Then in a similar fashion to how we constructed the topology on the product, they build the relevant structure on top of this set. The category of sets is the simplest example, where there is no additional structure, you just have the set of pairs, and that's it.
For later, it could be worth noting that the abstract definition (suitably generalized) is a big contributor to why a product of infinitely many spaces doesn't have the topology you might intuitively expect the first time you encounter it.