Why do Riemannian metrics have to be smooth? Can you give an example of a smooth curve with a none smooth metric and show me what possibly will go wrong if our metric is not smooth?
2026-04-01 16:22:28.1775060548
Why Riemannian metrics have to be smooth?
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To begin with, nothing has to be smooth. There are deep theories concerning manifolds which are only $C^k$ for some $k$, or topological manifolds, which don't even have to be differentiable.
But when considering the category of smooth manifolds and smooth maps, certain constructions have to be smooth in order for the resulting objects to fit into this category. For example, the inverse image of a regular value under a smooth map is again a smooth manifold. If we omit the requirement that the initial map is smooth, the resulting manifold will not be smooth either (actually, sometimes it will not be a manifold at all). Alternatively, consider smooth vector fields. We know that such a vector field has a flow function which induces diffeomorphisms from the given manifold to itself. If the vector field is not smooth, the resulting automorphisms will not be smooth either, thus will not preserve the basic structure of any object in this category.
It is the same with the metric tensor. This tensor actually gives an isomorphism between the tangent and cotangent spaces at every point on the manifold. When it is also smooth, it yields an isomorphism of vector bundles between the tangent and cotangent bundles, i.e. it transforms smooth $1$-forms into smooth vector fields, and vice versa. Just one example, out of many - Let $f:M\to\mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function, so the derivative $df$ is a smooth $1$-form, and the metric induces the corresponding vector field $\nabla f$, the gradient. If the metric is smooth, then so is $\nabla f$, thus it has a smooth flow function and so on. If the metric is not smooth, then neither is the obtained gradient, and it just means that this vector field does not fit into the smooth category.
There are many other examples for things that "go wrong" if the metric is not smooth. The "bad" outcome is always that some obtained map or manifold or any other object will not be smooth either. It is worth mentioning that this "bad" outcome is not always so bad. As written above, there is a lot to do with non-smooth constructions. However, there are some results which require smoothness or at least the existence of many derivatives, and these results may fail to hold if one uses a non-smooth metric.