For example is $2x + 3 = \frac 5x$ quadratic?
On the one hand it has two solutions, $x = 1$ and $x = -5/2$ which is the number of solutions we'd expect from the fundamental theorem of algebra but on the other hand any equation in the form $ax + b = \frac cx$ would be undefined at $x = 0$ and every quadratic equation I'm familiar with is continuous over all real numbers. Is being continuous over all real numbers necessary for an equation to be called quadratic?
The fact that it has two solutions is not relevant here. The equation $2^x-x=0$ also has two solutions, but nobody would say that it is a quadratic equation. And the equation $x^2+1=0$ is a quadratic equation, in spite of the fact that it has no (real) solution.
A reasonable definition of quadratic equation would be: an equation of the type $q(x)=0$, where $q$ is a polynomial function with degree $2$. It would still be a quadratic equation even if we were only interested in solutions within a certain subset of $\Bbb R$ (such as, say, $(-\infty,1]$ or $\Bbb Q$).
Under this definition, your equation is not a quadratic equation. However, its solutions are the solutions of the quadratic equation $2x^2+3x-5=0$.