My answer is that
Let $A$ represent a student that answers any question, and let $S$ represent a sleepy student. Then, $\exists x (S(x)\wedge \neg A(x))$.
Is it correct?
My answer is that
Let $A$ represent a student that answers any question, and let $S$ represent a sleepy student. Then, $\exists x (S(x)\wedge \neg A(x))$.
Is it correct?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Exists x with (x is sleepy student and
not for all q, (q is question implies x answers q)),
which is equivalent to
Exists x with (x is sleepy student and
exist q with (q is question and not-(x answers q)).
However “Some sleepy students do not answer any question.”
is liguishically awkward.
"Some sleepy students do not answer any questions.”
does not have that semantic difficulty but has a different meaning. Namely:
Exists x with (x is sleepy student and
for all q, (q is question implies not-(x answers q))).