For the purpose of clarity, I do not want anybody to prove this statement, I am just looking to get some help translating it into the contrapositive using symbolic logic. Right now I have the following translation:
Original Statement:
$$(\exists k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n = 2k) \quad \land \quad (\exists m \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n+1 =m^2) \quad \Rightarrow \quad \text{n is divisible by 8}$$
Contrapositive Statement:
$$ \text{n is not divisible by 8} \quad \Rightarrow \quad (\exists k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n = 2k+1) \quad \lor \quad (\forall m \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n+1 \neq m^2) $$
A couple of points of clarification:
- I wasn't sure how to write $n$ is divisible by 8. Perhaps it could have been stated as $\exists p \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n = 8p$?
- For the negation of $\exists k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad n = 2k$, I know that typically you might want to reverse the $\exists$ to an $\forall$, but I think what I wrote makes sense since the negation of even numbers is odd numbers.
Eventually I will try to prove this statement by contrapositive, but I want to get some practice in with translating mathematical statements into a more formal structure.
My question(s) are following:
- Is the original translation correct? How might it be improved?
- How could I more formally translate '$n$ is divisible by 8'?
- Is the contrapositive stated correctly?
I also am not able to use $mod$ notation, $a|b$ notation, or anything that is unique to Abstract Algebra.
If $n$ is not divisible by 8, then either $n$ is not an even integer or $n+1$ is not a square.