In "EVERY MODULE IS AN INVERSE LIMIT OF INJECTIVES" (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.3173.pdf) it is proven that every modules is an inverse limit of injective modules. A natural question is whether this can be generalized to arbitrary abelian categories. Maybe the most natural hope would be that if we consider abelian category with enough injectives $\mathcal{C}$ and choose an object $M$, we take the limit over all injective objects such we have an injection $M\hookrightarrow I$, i.e. we ask $$M=\text{lim}_{M\hookrightarrow I_\alpha} I_{\alpha}?$$ Of course, there might be other approaches, but this seems quite natural to me. Also, the case that interests me the most is the category of sheaves of abelian groups on a site.
2026-03-26 14:29:01.1774535341
Writting objects in abelian category as limit of injective objects
237 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in ABELIAN-CATEGORIES
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Injective objects in a category
- Category of complexes
- Snake lemma and regular epi mono factorization
- A question to Weibel’s IHA lemma 2.6.14 Part 2
- Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?
- Supremum of a family of subobjects in an abelian category
- Opposite effective classes in a Grothendieck group
- Question about $\mbox{Ext}$ groups in abelian categories
- How to show that $\mathsf{Ab}$(Category of Abelian Groups) is an abelian category?
Related Questions in INJECTIVE-MODULE
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
- injective hull of a ring that is not integral domain
- Decomposition of injective modules over polynomial rings
- Problem based on Projective and Injective Module
- Example of reduced module
- Injective object in the category of projective systems of $R$-modules.
- Injective Linear Transformation $K[x]_{\leq 4}\rightarrow V$
- For $d\mid m$, $\mathbb{Z}/d\mathbb{Z}$ is not an injective $\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}$-module when some prime divides $d$ and $\frac{m}{d}$
- $\mathbb{Q}_{\mathbb{Z}}$ is an injective hull of $\mathbb{Z}$
- Element in a finitely generated torsion module on a PID with smallest non-zero annihilator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is false. To my mind it's a little easier to think about the dual question: in an abelian category with enough projectives, is every object a filtered colimit of projective objects?
In the category of modules over a ring $R$, which has enough projectives, we have that
Hence the filtered colimits of projective objects are precisely the flat modules, and so any ring $R$ with a non-flat module $M$ (precisely the rings which are not von Neumann regular) is a counterexample. Very explicitly and dualizing, $\text{Ab}^{op}$ is a counterexample to your original question.
In general $\text{Ab}^{op}$ is a pretty nice counterexample to a bunch of conjectures you might have about how abelian categories behave; I've used it a couple times in other MO and math.SE answers. Note that by Pontryagin duality it's equivalent to the category of compact Hausdorff abelian groups, so we can think about it a bit more concretely than just as an opposite category.
In $\text{Ab}$ the projective objects are the free abelian groups and the flat modules are the torsion-free abelian groups. The Pontryagin dual statements are that in $\text{Ab}^{op}$ the injective objects are the products of copies of $S^1$ and the cofiltered limits of injective objects are the connected compact Hausdorff abelian groups. Hence any disconnected compact Hausdorff abelian group, e.g. any finite nontrivial abelian group, is a counterexample; these are Pontryagin dual to the abelian groups which have torsion.