In addition to a positive Lyapunov exponent (for sensitivity to ICs), why do continuous chaotic dynamical systems also require a zero Lyapunov exponent?
2026-02-26 15:39:39.1772120379
Zero Lyapunov exponent for chaotic systems
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Related Questions in CHAOS-THEORY
- Chaotic behaviour from iteration process.
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Homeomorphism between Smale set and $\{0,2\} ^{\mathbb{Z}}$
- Making something a control parameter or a variable when analysing a dynamical system
- Lorenz attractor as a position-velocity-acceleration problem
- Do chaos and/or limit cycles always require the existence of an unstable fixed point?
- Is the "sensitive dependence on initial conditions" of chaotic systems referring to the seed, control parameters, or both?
- Logistic map and chaos on a Cantor set
- Moser invariant curves in discrete dynamical systems and how they give stability
- Why do we need folding and a finite domain for chaos?
Related Questions in LYAPUNOV-EXPONENTS
- Largest Lyapunov Exponent
- Zero Lyapunov exponent for chaotic systems
- A Lemma Related to Oseledets' Theorem
- Can Jacobi Fields be used to explicitly calculate Lyapunov exponents for geodesic flows?
- Connection between ergodicity and Lyapunov exponents
- Action of the adjoint operator in tangent space
- Lyapunov Exponents for $n$-Dimensional Matrix $A$
- Lyapunov methods to show the trajectories that do not converge to the origin
- Relation between symmetries and Lyapunov exponents
- Is this a viable way to calculate the Lyapunov Exponent?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Every continuous-time dynamical system with a bounded, non fixed-point dynamics has at least one zero Lyapunov exponent. This does not only apply to chaotic dynamics but also to periodic or quasiperiodic ones.
To see why this is the case, let $x$ and $y$ be the two trajectory segments, whose separation ($x-y$) you consider for defining or calculating the Lyapunov exponents. At every point of the attractor (or invariant manifold), we can represent this separation in a basis of Lyapunov vectors, each of which corresponds to one Lyapunov exponent. In this representation, each component of the separation grows or shrinks independently according to the respective Lyapunov exponent (on average). For example, in chaos with one positive Lyapunov exponent, the separation will quickly point in the corresponding direction because this Lyapunov exponent dominates the other ones.
Now, suppose that the trajectory segment $y$ is such that $y(t) = x(t+ε)$ for some time $t$, i.e., it is a temporally slightly advanced version of $x$. The separation of these segments may grow and shrink with time, depending on the speed of the phase-space flow, but on average it should stay constant due to the following: Since the dynamics is bounded, the trajectory $x$ will need to get close to $x(t)$ again, i.e., there needs to be some $τ$ such that $x(t+τ) \approx x(t)$. Due to the phase-space flow being continuous, we also have $y(t+τ) = x(t+τ+ε) \approx x(t+ε) = y(t)$ and thus:
$$ |x(t+τ) - y(t+τ)| \approx |x(t)-y(t)|$$
Therefore, separations in the direction of time neither shrink nor grow (on average) and in this direction we get a zero Lyapunov exponent: If we consider only such separations to compute a Lyapunov exponent, we obtain:
$$ \begin{align} λ &= \lim_{τ→∞} \; \lim_{|x(t)-y(t)|→0}\; \frac{1}{τ} \ln\left(\frac{|x(t+τ)-y(t+τ)|}{|x(t)-y(t)|}\right)\\ &= \lim_{τ→∞} \; \lim_{|x(t)-y(t)|→0}\; \frac{1}{τ} \ln\left(\frac{|x(t)-y(t)|}{|x(t)-y(t)|}\right)\\ &=0 \end{align} $$
(We now have $=$ instead of $\approx$ due to the limits averaging everything and allowing us to consider arbitrarily close $x(t)$ and $x(t+τ)$.)
Finally, it’s intuitive that separations along the time direction do not mingle with separations in other directions and thus correspond to one distinct Lyapunov vector at every point on the attractor.
Therefore, all such dynamical systems must have at least one zero Lyapunov exponent.
For a more rigorous and detailed discussion, see H. Haken – At least one Lyapunov exponent vanishes if the trajectory of an attractor does not contain a fixed point, Phys. Lett. A (1983).