There are two players each has $n$ balls. At the same time they distribute their balls among $m$ boxes. For each box 1 point is given to the player with more balls and zero points to other one (When a tie occurs they toss a coin to give 1 point to a player and zero to other) At the end winner is the one with more points (again toss a coin at the case of tie). For which pairs of $(m,n)$ this game might have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium? If not what is the easiest proof?
2026-03-28 15:19:51.1774711191
A 2 Player Pure Strategy Game
156 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GAME-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Perfect Information Game and Chance node
- Valid operations to the value of a matrix game
- Rook Game Problem Solving
- Proof of Axiom of Transparency in Aumman's model of knowledge
- Sion's MinMax theorem over matrices
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- How to prove that a strategy profile is a Proper Equilibrium?
Related Questions in COMBINATORIAL-GAME-THEORY
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- Unrestricted Gomoku on a small board
- combinatorial game of sheets
- Analysis of a combinatorial game with prime numbers
- Even numbers combinatorial game
- Show that there exists at least one player who wins a trophy
- Tower Of Hanoi (4 Pegs)
- Queues and permutation/combination
- Maths strategy games
- Find number of solutions to special "Lights Out!" puzzle scenarios
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $m \gg n$, (i.e. $m$ is much larger than $n$), then it seems clear that the optimal strategy is to randomly choose $n$ bins and place one ball in each bin. The reason why this should be optimal is that if someone decides to place more than one ball in a bin, then they probably would have gotten one point for that bin anyway if they just put one ball in that bin because the other player put 0 balls in that bin, but also they could have gotten one extra point for each other ball in bin except the first ball in the bin if they put the rest of the balls from the bin into other randomly selected bins. This is a pure Nash equilibrium where each player chooses $n$ random bins and puts one ball in each bin. If $m$ is close to $n$ or worse if $n \geq m$ then I'm not sure.