A finite field cannot be an ordered field.

3.1k Views Asked by At

I am reading baby Rudin and it says all ordered fields with supremum property are isomorphic to $\mathbb R$. Since all ordered finite fields would have supremum property that must mean none exist. Could someone please show me a proof of this?

Thank you very much, Regards.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

8
On BEST ANSWER

HINT: Suppose that $(F,0,1,+,\cdot,<)$ is an ordered field which is finite of characteristic $p$. Then $0<1<1+1<\ldots$, conclude a contradiction.

0
On

Hint $\ $ In an ordered ring, positives are closed under addition (so a sum of positives is $\ne 0$).

Remark $\ $ More generally, note that linearly ordered groups are torsion-free: $\rm\: 0\ne n\in \mathbb N,$ $\rm\:g>0 \:\Rightarrow\: n\cdot g = g +\cdots + g > 0,\:$ since positives are closed under addition. Conversely, a torsion-free commutative group can be linearly ordered (Levi, $1942$).

0
On

Hint: any finite field must have a non-zero characteristic.