In Lee book, "Introduction to Smooth Manifold, 2nd edition" there is a proof about the existence and Uniqueness of the Exterior differentiation (page 365). He define the exterior differentiation of a smooth $k$-form $\omega\in \Omega^k(M)$ locally on each smooth chart $(U, \phi)$ by using pullbacks: $$d\omega = \phi^*d(\phi^{-1*}\omega).$$ My question is how do we pullback $\omega$ by $\phi^{-1}$? why I ask because by definition of pullback we could pull back by $\phi^{-1}$ only for forms on $U$, but here $\omega$ is a smooth form on $M$ not $U$. Something is not clear here for me please help.
2026-02-23 13:24:47.1771853087
A question about pullback of a smooth form.
116 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in PULLBACK
- Pullbacks and pushouts with surjective functions and quotient sets?
- Is a conformal transformation also a general coordinate transformation?
- Pullback square with two identical sides
- Pullbacks and differential forms, require deep explanation + algebra rules
- $\Pi_f$ for a morphism $f$ between simplicial sets
- Find a non vanishing differential form on the torus
- Suppose that $X$ is a sub affine variety of $Y$ , and let $φ : X \to Y$ be the inclusion. Prove that $φ^*$ is surjective...
- Equality Proof of Pushforward and Pullback
- Why $f'$ is an isomorphism if the rightmost square is a pullback?
- Why the rightmost square is a pullback?
Related Questions in EXTERIOR-DERIVATIVE
- What is the physical OR geometrical interpretation of the exterior derivative?
- Show that $d(\omega ∧ \tau ) = (d\omega)∧\tau +(−1)^{\text{deg}\omega} w ∧d\tau.$
- existence of de Rham complexes
- Exterior derivative calculation in Chern and Hamilton paper
- The wedge of an exact form with a closed form is exact.
- Confusion over an exterior derivative product
- Product manifolds and exterior derivative with interior product
- Exterior Derivative over Quaternions
- find a vector field in $\mathbb{R^3}$ with specific properties
- Properties of forms and pullbacks
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Properly speaking, Lee is not pulling back $\omega$ but its restriction to $U$. We can define the restriction to $U$ of $\omega$ via $\omega|_U = i^*\omega$ where $i: U \longrightarrow M$ is the inclusion map. So really, this defines $(d\omega)|_U$. You can show that these glue together to properly define $d\omega$.