Let $X=A\cup B$ and $A,B$ closed. Let $f: A\to Y$ and $g: B\to Y$ be continuous functions and $f(x)=g(x)$ for all $x\in A\cap B$. Show that $h: X\to Y$, $h(x)=\begin{cases} f(x), \text{if}\,\,x\in A \\ g(x), \text{if}\,\, x\in B\end{cases}$
is well-defined and continuous.
To show, that $h$ is a well-defined function, should be easy. We have to show, that $h$ is 'left-totally'. Hence for every $x\in X$ exists a $y\in Y$ with $h(x)=y$.
And 'right-unique'. Hence for every $x\in X$ and $y, y'\in Y$ with $h(x)=y$ and $h(x)=y'$ is $y=y'$.
It is immediatly clear, that $h$ is 'left-totally' since $X=A\cup B$ and the definition of $h(x)$.
Also it is immedialty clear, that $h$ is 'right-unique', because $f$ and $g$ are functions (which are 'right-unique'). You could seperate some cases. For example: If $x\in A\setminus B$ and $h(x)=y$ and $h(x)=y'$. Then is $h(x)=f(x)=y$ and $f(x)=y'$. But $f$ is 'right-unique' and therefor $y=y'$.
The same for $x\in B\setminus A$ and $x\in A\cap B$. Actually, I do not even know, why this is a task. Maybe just to refresh what is meant with 'well-defined', or is there something to think about here?
And $h$ is continuous, because it is continuous in every point.
Am I missing something here? What has this to do with $A, B$ beeing closed?
Thanks in advance.
Showing that $h$ is well-defined is straightforward and you've done it already. Here's the part about continuity:
A well-known theorem in general topology, which is straightforward to prove, says that
Now let $Y_0 \subseteq Y$ be a closed set in the topological space $Y$. Then what is $h^{-1}[Y_o]$? Since $X= A \cup B$, one can write set-theoretically that
$$h^{-1}[Y_0]=\big\{x\in A: f(x)\in Y_0\big\}\cup\big\{x\in B: g(x)\in Y_0\big\}$$
which tells us that $$h^{-1}[Y_0] = f^{-1}[Y_0]\cup g^{-1}[Y_0]$$
Since $f$ is continuous, $f^{-1}[Y_0]$ is closed in $A$, since $A$ itself is closed in $X$ (this is where the assumption that $A$ and $B$ are closed in $X$ becomes useful), $f^{-1}[Y_0]$ is closed in $X$.
A similar argument for $B$ shows that $g^{-1}[Y_0]$ is closed in $X$. Hence, $h^{-1}[Y_0]$ is closed in $X$. Q.E.D.
A possible reason that this exercise was given is to emphasize that being open or closed are relative concepts. To move from being closed in a subspace to a superset is not trivial and one needs extra assumptions to make this move. Here, the assumption that $A$ and $B$ are closed in $X$ allows us to conclude that $f^{-1}[Y_0]$ and $g^{-1}[Y_0]$, not only are closed in $A$ and $B$ respectively, but they're closed in $X$ as well.
Addendum: In fact, we have the following characterization of closed sets in the subspace topology.
To see the proof, which follows the same line of thought as in your comment, see Brian M. Scott's post on this question.