In Lances book on Hilbert modules he states that if I have a C*-algebra $A$ and a (right) Hilbert module $E$ over $A$ then I can make the $n^{th}$ direct sum of $E$, denoted $E^n$, into a (right) Hilbert $M_n(A)$ module by seeing $x\in E^n$ as a row vector $x=(x_1,...x_n)$ and doing matrix multiplication. I.e. if $a\in M_n(A)$ then $xa=\sum x_ia_{ij}$ moreover we can equip it with the right $M_n(A)$ inner product given by $\langle x,y\rangle=(\langle x_i,y_j\rangle)_{ij}$. I see why this is a right Hilbert module and the construction looks like the exterior tensor product of $\mathbb{C}^n$ with $E$ where I use the $M_n(\mathbb{C})$ valued inner product. Now Lance claims that the adjointables $\mathcal{L}(E^n)\cong M_n(\mathcal{L}(E))$ and I'm not sure how to see this holding, can anyone help me with this? In general we have that with the exterior product of two Hilbert modules one has in this case the following containment $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{C}^n)\otimes \mathcal{L}(E) \subset \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{C}^n\otimes E)$ but the left hand side is just isomorphic to $\mathcal{L}(E)$ how do I in general find $\mathcal{L}(E^n)$?
2026-02-23 02:54:22.1771815262
Adjointable operators of a certain Hilbert module
215 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in C-STAR-ALGEBRAS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is a $*$-representation $\pi:A\to B(H)$ non-degenerate iff $\overline{\pi(A) B(H)} = B(H)$?
- Spectral theorem for inductive limits of $C^*$-Algebras
- Examples of unbounded approximate units in $C^*$-algebras
- Is there a way to describe these compactifications algebraically?
- Projections in C*-algebras
- Homogeneous C*-algebras
Related Questions in HILBERT-MODULES
- Doubt regarding Serre-Swan theorem and Hilbert modules
- Characterization of weak convergence in Hilbert $C^*$-modules?
- Operator norm on a Hilbert module
- Adjointable operators of a certain Hilbert module
- Does localisation of a faithful retraction induce an isomorphism between adjointables of Hilbert modules?
- Why is a certain series in a Hilbert module well defined?
- Projection Lemma for Hilbert C-star modules
- Direct sum of standard Hilbert A-modules
- Non commutative Atiyah-Singer theorem
- Inclusion into even, resp. odd indices is homotopic to identity?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $T\in M_n(\mathcal L(E))$ with coefficients $T_{ij}$, then for $\vec x, \vec y\in E^n$ you have
$$\langle \vec y, T\vec x\rangle = \sum_{ij} \langle y_i, T_{ij} x_j\rangle = \sum_{ij}\langle (T_{ij})^* y_i, x_j\rangle = \langle T^* \vec y, \vec x\rangle$$ where $(T^*)_{ij}=(T_{ji})^*$, ie the matrix is transposed and you take the adjoint of its coefficients. Hence the $A$-linear map given by the matrix $T$ is adjointable if the matrix components are adjointable.
For the other direction if $T:E^n\to E^n$ is $A$-linear and admits an adjoint $T^*$ denote with $T_{ij}$ the map $E\to E$ given by including $E$ into the $j$-the component of $E^n$, applying $T$ and then projecting onto the $i$-the component, ie $$T_{ij}:E\overset{\mathrm{incl}_j}\to E^n \overset T\to E^n\overset{\mathrm{proj}_i}\to E,$$ this defines the components of the matrix associated to $T$. Why are the components adjointable? Well: $$\langle y, T_{ij} x\rangle = \langle \mathrm{incl}_i[y], T (\mathrm{incl}_j[x])\rangle = \langle T^*(\mathrm{incl}_i[y]), \mathrm{incl}_j[x]\rangle = \langle (T^*)_{ji}y,x\rangle$$ and $(T_{ij})^*= (T^*)_{ji}$ as we should expect from the first part.