Let $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a Brownian motion and $T$ a stopping time such that $T < \infty$ a.s. Then the Strong Markov property (SMP) asserts that under the probability measure $\mathbb{P}( \, \cdot \, \vert \, T < \infty)$, the process $$ B_{t}^{(T)} = \mathbb{1}_{\{T < \infty\}} (B_{T+t} - B_T) $$ is a Brownian motion independent of $$ \mathcal{F}_{T} = \{A \in \mathcal{F}_{\infty} \colon A \cap \{T \leq t\} \in \mathcal{F}_t \text{ for all } t \geq 0\}, $$ where $\mathcal{F}_{\infty} = \sigma(B_s \colon s \geq 0)$ and $\mathcal{F}_t = \sigma(B_s \colon 0 \leq s \leq t)$.
Now I have a question to a remark I found in a book: By the (SMP) $$ T = \sup \{s \in [0,1] \colon B_s = 0\} $$ is not a stopping time. Why is this a consequence of the (SMP), how can we formally prove this?
Choose $r \in (0,1)$ such that $\mathbb{P}(T \leq r) \geq 1/2$. Then
$$W_t(\omega) := B_{T+t}(\omega)-\underbrace{B_T(\omega)}_{0} = B_{T+t}(\omega) \neq 0 \qquad \text{for all $t \in [0,1-r]$, $\omega \in \{T \leq r\}$}.$$
This means that $(W_t)_{t \geq 0}$ cannot be a Brownian motion (see below). By the strong Markov property, this implies that $T$ is not a stopping time.