Question
I would like to derive the entropy of Archimedean parametric copulas (Clayton, Frank, or Gumbel), focusing here on the Clayton copula. Link to similar question on the t-copula.
The bivariate copula function, $C$, for the Clayton copula, with transformed marginals $u$ and $v$, and dependence parameter $\theta\in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, is
$$ C(u, v) = \bigg[ u^{-\theta} + v^{-\theta} -1 \bigg]^{-1/\theta} $$
Its copula density is the second mixed partial derivative of $C(u,v)$:
\begin{align} c\left(u,v ; \theta\right) = (1+\theta)(u \cdot v)^{-1-\theta}(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1)^{-\frac{1}{\theta}-2} \end{align}
The differential entropy of a univariate variable's pdf, $f(x)$, is typically $$H(X)=-\int_{-\infty} ^{\infty} f(x) \ln f(x) dx$$
while any copula entropy can be estimated as
$$H(c(u,v))=-\int_{[0,1]^2} c(u,v) \ln c(u,v) \hspace{1mm} du \hspace{1mm} dv $$
How can we derive a closed-form analytical solution for the entropy of the Clayton copula density $c(u,v)$?
First attempt
\begin{align} H(c(u,v)) =& -\iint_{[0,1]^2} c\left(u, v ; \theta\right) \ln c\left(u, v ; \theta\right) \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ = & -\iint_{[0,1]^2} (1+\theta)\left(u v\right)^{-1-\theta}\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right)^{-\frac{1}{\theta}-2}\\ \times & \ln\left[(1+\theta)\left(u v\right)^{-1-\theta}\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right)^{-\frac{1}{\theta}-2}\right] \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ = & -(1+\theta) \iint_{[0,1]^2} \left(u v\right)^{-1-\theta}\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right)^{-\frac{1}{\theta}-2}\\ \times & \left[\ln(1+\theta) - (1+\theta)\ln\left(u v\right) -\left(\frac{1}{\theta}+2\right)\ln\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right)\right] \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ = & -(1+\theta) \iint_{[0,1]^2} \bigg[\ln(1+\theta) c - (1+\theta)\ln\left(u v\right) c -\left(\frac{1}{\theta}+2\right)\ln\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right) c \bigg] \ \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ = & -(1+\theta) \ln(1+\theta) \iint_{[0,1]^2} c \ \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v + (1+\theta)^2\iint_{[0,1]^2} c \ln\left(u v\right) \ \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ + & (1+\theta) \left(\frac{1}{\theta}+2\right) \iint_{[0,1]^2} c \ln\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right) \ \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v \\ \stackrel{\dagger}{=} & -(1+\theta) \ln(1+\theta) \int_0^1 c \bigg|_{v=0}^{v=1} \ \mathrm{d}u + (1+\theta)^2 \int_0^1 c \ln\left(u v\right) \bigg|_{v=0}^{v=1} \ \mathrm{d}u\\ + & (1+\theta) \left(\frac{1}{\theta}+2\right) \int_0^1 c \ln\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right) \bigg|_{v=0}^{v=1} \ \mathrm{d}u \\ = & ? \end{align}
where $c = \left(u v\right)^{-1-\theta}\left(u^{-\theta}+v^{-\theta}-1\right)^{-\frac{1}{\theta}-2} $, and $\dagger$ is due to treating the double integrals as an iterated integral,
$$\iint_{[0,1]^2} c(u,v) \ \mathrm{d}u \, \mathrm{d}v = \int_0^1 c(u,v) \bigg|_{v=0}^{v=1} \mathrm{d}u $$
Why do I think an analytical solution of copula entropy can be found? Because there is one for the entropy of the Normal distribution's pdf, derived here.
The place for a comment was too short for the following, so this became an answer.
Well, removing a factor (namely the factor that makes live too short to compute...) simplifies things in a high measure, but we still have a mess... For the above i see only some first steps, but then things still get complicated. The $\theta$ is hard to type, there will be a $t$ instead. We have $$ \begin{aligned} H &=- \iint_{[0,1]^2} \frac {(1+t)(uv)^{-t}} {(u^{-t} + v^{-t} -1)^{2+1/t}}\;\ln \frac {(1+t)(uv)^{-t-1}} {(u^{-t} + v^{-t} -1)^{2+1/t}} \; \frac {du}u \; \frac {dv}v \\ &= \iint_{I^2} \frac {(1+t)UV} {(U + V -1)^{2+1/t}} \; \ln \frac {(1+t)(UV)^{-(1+t)/t}} {(U + V-1)^{2+1/t}} \; \frac 1{t^2} \; \frac {dU}U \; \frac {dV}V \\ &= \frac {1+t}{t^2} \iint_{I^2} \frac 1{(U + V -1)^{2+1/t}} \;\ln \frac {(1+t)(UV)^{-(1+t)/t}} {(U + V - 1)^{2+1/t}} \; dU\; dV\ . \end{aligned} $$ We substituted $U=u^{-t}$, $V=v^{-t}$, so $\frac {dU}U$ is $(-t)\frac {du}u$, and $\frac {dV}V$ is $(-t)\frac {dv}v$, so that we obtain a better looking expression.
The integral is now over $I^2$, where $I$ is $[1,\infty]$, because of the sign of $-t$ in $U=u^{-t}$.
Now under the logarithm we split four factors. And have to compute correspondingly four integrals.
Now try to apply integration by parts to get rid of the logarithmic term. For special values of $t$ (and $a$) this may be computed, but i will stop here.