Average of Vectors squared minus the square of the averaged vectors

99 Views Asked by At

I have already asked this question in Physics, but as someone pointed out it is more appropriate to place it here.

Say I've obtained a series of 3D vectors, (x, y, z), with a different vector at different points in time. I want to obtain the second moment of this set of vector's fluctuations in time. This is given by:

$<$ M $^2> - <$ M $>^2$,

where M is the vector in 3D, and the average is over time. To me, you can solve this simply by taking:

$<$ M $^2> - <$ M $>^2 = <$ (x, y, z ) $ \cdot $ (x, y, z ) $> - <$ (x, y, z ) $> \cdot <$ (x, y, z ) $>$.

However, I have seen this solved by decomposing the vector along different Cartesian axis:

$<$ M $^2> - <$ M $>^2 = < $ M $_x^2 > - < $ M $_x >^2 + < $ M $_y^2 > - < $ M $_y >^2 + < $ M $_z^2 > - < $ M $_z >^2 $.

This is shown on page 2548 in Pitera et al., Biophysical Journal, 2001, 20, 2546–2555. Paper Link.

I just wanted some clarification if this second method is correct, and I guess whether the first is also. To me, the second method is not possible as you cannot decompose $<$ M $>$ as they have. Less so if you then square the decomposed parts.

Thank you for any help, and apologies for any grievances about the formatting.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

The average of the square is the average of the square of the components by linearity of expectations: $$ \langle\mathbf M^2\rangle=\langle M_x^2+M_y^2+M_z^2\rangle=\langle M_x^2\rangle+\langle M_y^2\rangle+\langle M_z^2\rangle $$

The square of the average can be decomposed into components, and no cross terms will survive, since we're evaluating an inner product in an orthonormal basis. (In a non-orthonormal bases, this decomposition would not be valid.) $$ \langle\mathbf M\rangle^2=\langle M_x\hat x+M_y\hat y+M_z\hat z\rangle^2=\left(\langle M_x\rangle \hat x+\langle M_y\rangle \hat y+\langle M_z\rangle \hat z\right)^2=\langle M_x\rangle^2+\langle M_y\rangle^2+\langle M_z\rangle^2 $$ Does this clear up the logic behind the decomposition?