Starting from an arbitrary point on an ellipsoid, moving straight at a random direction along the surface, are you always guaranteed to come back to the starting point eventually?
2026-05-15 21:48:07.1778881687
can I travel in the same direction along the surface of an ellipsoid without ever returning home?
106 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in EUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- Circle inside kite inside larger circle
- If in a triangle ABC, ∠B = 2∠C and the bisector of ∠B meets CA in D, then the ratio BD : DC would be equal to?
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- JMO geometry Problem.
- Measure of the angle
- Difference between parallel and Equal lines
- Complex numbers - prove |BD| + |CD| = |AD|
- Find the ratio of segments using Ceva's theorem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'd say the anser is no, for the reasons outlined below.
I interpret your question as choosing a random initial direction from the arbitrary point, then moving in said direction along a geodesic path. Searching the web I found http://geographiclib.sourceforge.net/1.29/triaxial.html which states:
The amount by which these “fall short” of closing after a single turn around can be tuned by choosing the dimensions of the ellipsoid. So it should be possible to make this distance incommensurable with the full circuit. The distance measure used to express this incomesurability would have to be some which corrects for the elliptic form, so that you get the same offset for every iteration around the ellipsoid. But the general idea of some form of irrational ratio between full circuit and geodesic revolution should always be possible.
The page quoted above also mentions other classes of geodesics. In that sense, the formulation of “all other geodesics” in the quotation above isn't strictly true, but for us here it is enough to know that geodesics of this kind do exists. Here is a more interesting class for your question:
So you can choose a point which lies on such an umbilical geodesic, but not opn $y=0$, and the direction of the umbilical geodesic that goes with it. Since the geodesic will converge towards the $y=0$ plane, you can be certain that you'll never return to your starting point if you didn't return there after a few iterations. The illustration on that page should be helpful in seeing that the latter won't happen. Of course, the probability for randomly choosing the correct angle for such an umbilical geodesic for an arbitrary starting point is strictly speaking zero. So it will “almost never” happen, but it is still possible.
The interesting aspect about these umbilical geodesics is that you won't even come close to your starting point. This is in contrast to the incommensurable situation above, where you won't return to your exact starting location but will come arbitrary close to it.