I encountered the following infinite summation $$\sum_{k=0,k\neq m}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{(k-m)k!},x>0,$$ can it be simplified? Thanks!
2026-04-07 14:38:29.1775572709
Can this infinite summation be simplified?
90 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Related Questions in POWER-SERIES
- Conditions for the convergence of :$\cos\left( \sum_{n\geq0}{a_n}x^n\right)$
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Pointwise and uniform convergence of function series $f_n = x^n$
- Divergence of power series at the edge
- Maclaurin polynomial estimating $\sin 15°$
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- How to I find the Taylor series of $\ln {\frac{|1-x|}{1+x^2}}$?
- Convergence radius of power series can be derived from root and ratio test.
- Recognizing recursion relation of series that is solutions of $y'' + y' + x^2 y = 0$ around $x_0 = 0$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As already mentioned, a possible approach consists in multiplying the sum by $x^{-m}$ which leads to a sum easy to express on exponential form. But what follows with this method is rather arduous, because further integration involves an incomplete Gamma function with negative integer parameter.
In order to save time, we will use another method (a short-cut in fact), starting from the known formula of the incomplete Gamma function in case of negative integer parameter : $$\Gamma(-m,z)=\frac{(-1)^m}{m!}\big(\psi(m+1)-\ln(z)\big)-\frac{1}{z^m} \sum_{k=0,k\neq m}^{\infty}\frac{(-z)^k}{(k-m)k!}$$ $$\sum_{k=0,k\neq m}^{\infty}\frac{(-z)^k}{(k-m)k!}=z^m\left( \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}\big(\psi(m+1)-\ln(z)\big)-\Gamma(-m,z) \right)$$ For $x$ positive variable : $z=-x$ so that : $$\sum_{k=0,k\neq m}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{(k-m)k!}=(-x)^m\left( \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}\big(\psi(m+1)-\ln(-x)\big)-\Gamma(-m,-x) \right)$$ $\ln(-x)$ and $\Gamma(-m,-x)$ are both complex. But, the imaginary part fades in the formula. So, in separating the real part, we can write : $$\sum_{k=0,k\neq m}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{(k-m)k!}=(-x)^m\left( \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}\big(\psi(m+1)-\ln(x)\big)-\operatorname{Re}\big(\Gamma(-m,-x)\big) \right)$$ In this formula, $\psi$ is the symbol for the digamma function, $\Gamma$ is the symbol for the Incomplete Gamma function and $\operatorname{Re}$ is the symbol for the real part (to be not confused with the modulus, of course).
The formula has been tested with numerical computations.