Is there a categorical proof that the subgroups of free groups are free? Also that abelian subgroups of free abelian groups are free.
2026-03-27 13:24:31.1774617871
Categorical proof that subgroups of free groups are free?
327 Views Asked by user153312 https://math.techqa.club/user/user153312/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in FREE-GROUPS
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Help resolving this contradiction in descriptions of the fundamental groups of the figure eight and n-torus
- What is tricky about proving the Nielsen–Schreier theorem?
- Abelian Groups and Homomorphic Images of Free Abelian Groups
- Proof check, existence of free product
- determine if a subgroup of a free group is normal
- Bass-Serre tree of Isom($\mathbb{Z}$)
- Finitely Generated Free Group to Finitely Generated Free Monoid
- Crossed homomorphism/derivation on free group
- Existence of elementd of infinite order in finitely generated infinite group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It depends on what you mean by a categorical proof. In any case, there won't be a proof which is so abstract that it works in any algebraic category, because (as was already mentioned in the comments) the claim fails in many algebraic categories, for example modules, (commutative) rings, Lie algebras.
Among beginners of category there might be a conception that, as soon as we have described some known objects and constructions via category theory, we can use this big machinery of category theory to solve all problems. Well, category theory helps to solve all trivial problems at once (or reveal that problems are trivial) and helps to organize the mathematics which is needed to solve problems, but this does not mean that category theory alone will do our job. In the end, there will still be some concrete work to do.
My favorite proof of the Nielsen-Schreier Theorem is the characterization of free groups as those groups which act freely on a tree. In categorical terms, we have found a class of groups $\mathcal{S}$ such that a group $G$ is free if and only if $G$ is a subgroup of a group in $\mathcal{S}$. From this it follows immediately that subgroups of free groups are free. But the existence of $\mathcal{S}$ is no abstract nonsense.