You are offered a chance to play a game. the rules are simple. there are $100$ cards face down. Of these, $55$ say win and $45$ say lose. You begin with $10000$ dollars. You must bet $1/2$ of your money on each card turned over, and you either win or lose that amount based on what the card says. At the end of the game, all the cards have been turned over. Are you ahead or behind at the end of the card game? How much do you have at the end of your game? What arrangement of cards will earn you the most money?
My attempt:
You have a 100% chance of winning if $p>\frac{1}{2}$ and $p$ chance of winning if $p<\frac{1}{2}$. Suppose that $p>\frac{1}{2}$. Then each time you bet exactly half your money. If you have $x$ dollars, you end up with $\frac{3}{2}x$ if you win and $\frac{1}{2}x$ if you lose, hence your expected outcome is $\frac{3}{2} xp + \frac{1}{2}x(1-p)$ which equals $xp + \frac{1}{2}x$, in this case $x=10,000,$ $p=0.55,$ and $1-p=0.45$. So if $p>\frac{1}{2}$, then the total is greater than $x$.
Given that each game on average gains you money and you can play an arbitrary number of games, of course you should have 100% chance of doubling your money.
Similarly, if $p<\frac{1}{2}$, it can be shown that no matter how much we bet, we lose money on average. Then on average our money will tend to go toward zero, so we're better off just going all-in at the start, with $p$ chance of doubling our money.
I was trying to solve this problem and I am not sure if this is correct. I tried teaching this to myself, but I am not sure if I should do it this way or is there an easier way of doing this. I was working on this for a while now and I wanted to see if this concept is also correct. Can someone please help me with the solution?
For me, you will have $10000\cdot(3/2)^{55}\cdot(1/2)^{45}$ at the end of the game whatever you do. Multiplication is commutative, so it does not matter in which order you will turn the cards.
Another way of seeing it: suppose you have $N\$$ before your turn. Your expected outcome will be $N\cdot(3/2\cdot55/100 + 1/2\cdot45/100)$. After 100 turns, you will have $10000\cdot(1.05)^{100}$, which once again does not depend on the order.
The method is completely wrong, since your expected outcome will be $N\cdot1.05$ only at the first turn. There is probably a way to prove it using a similar reasoning, but it will be tortuous.
I am letting what I've done before to highlight the fact that this cannot work (in case anyone is tempted to use this method for another problem).