Imagine we have 3 predators living in the same forest lets call them $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$. They all live by themselves and see eachother as competitors, therefore if one predator meets another one they will fight to death. We assume that all the predators are equally strong such that if two meets in a fight, the probability of one will win against another is $1/2$. We further assume that the waiting time between any two predators meet is exponential distributed with rate parameter $\lambda$. As I see it for each predator there is 4 possible states: "alive", "in a fight with $P_i$", "in a fight with $P_j$" and "dead". It is assumed that all predators start in the "alive" state with probability 1: $$ \phi_i(0) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \ , \quad i \in \{1,2,3\} $$ I now want to formulate the transition probability matrix $\textbf{P}$. Since there is four states $\textbf{P}$ is a 4 times 4 matrix. The probabilty of $P_k$ meeting $P_i$ at time $t$ must by the exponential distribution assumption be equal to $1-e^{-\lambda t}$, hence we put $\textbf{P}_{21} = 1-e^{-\lambda t}$ and $\textbf{P}_{31} = 1-e^{-\lambda t}$. Further since we assume that a predator only can die from a fight we put $\textbf{P}_{41} = 0$. Now since each columns in the transition probability matrix has to add to one the first column in $\textbf{P}$ must be: $$ \textbf{P}^{(1)} = \begin{pmatrix} 2e^{-\lambda t} - 1 \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ The second and third column in $\textbf{P}$ corresponds to a predator in a fight in another predator. I imagine that the fight is instantaneous in time therefore these columns have the structure: $$ \textbf{P}^{(2)} = \textbf{P}^{(3)} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ \frac{1}{2} \end{pmatrix} $$ The last column corresponds to the case there the predator is dead, and if it is dead it way stay in that state forever thus: $$ \textbf{P}^{(4)} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ From this we conclude that the total probability transition matrix must have the from: $$ \textbf{P}(t) = \begin{pmatrix} 2e^{-\lambda t} - 1 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 1 \end{pmatrix} \ . $$ We now want to find the probability for being in each of the states for each predator. To find this be multiply the initial state with the transition matrix then we get: $$ \phi_i(t) = \textbf{P}(t)\phi_i(0) = \begin{pmatrix} 2e^{-\lambda t} - 1 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2e^{-\lambda t} - 1 \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} \\ 1-e^{-\lambda t} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \ . $$ This final results seems wrong since for large $t$ we get: $$ \lim_{t \to \infty} \phi_i(t) = \begin{pmatrix} - 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ which is not a probability vector. Is my approach wrong?
2026-02-23 15:03:07.1771858987
Competing predators modelled using continuous time Markov Chain.
47 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in MARKOV-CHAINS
- Calculating probabilities using Markov chains.
- Probability being in the same state
- Random walk on $\mathbb{Z}^2$
- Polya's Urn and Conditional Independence
- Markov Chain never reaches a state
- Finding a mixture of 1st and 0'th order Markov models that is closest to an empirical distribution
- Find probability function of random walk, stochastic processes
- Generating cycles on a strongly connected graph
- Will be this random walk a Markov chain?
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
Related Questions in MARKOV-PROCESS
- Definition of a Markov process in continuous state space
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Given a probability $p$, what is the upper bound of how many columns in a row-stochastic matrix exceed $p$?
- Infinitesimal generator of $3$-dimensional Stochastic differential equation
- Controlled Markov process - proper notation and set up
- Easy way to determine the stationary distribution for Markov chain?
- Why cant any 3 events admit Markov Property?
- Absorbing Markov chain and almost sure convergence
- Transition probabilities for many-states Markov model
- How to derive a diffusion tensor and stationary states given a Markov process transition matrix?
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-MODELING
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Solving the heat equation with robin boundary conditions
- How to use homogeneous coordinates and the projective plane to study the intersection of two lines
- inhomogeneous coordinates to homogeneous coordinates
- Writing Differential equations to describe a system
- Show that $z''+F(z') + z=0$ has a unique, stable periodic solution.
- Similar mathematic exercises about mathematical model
- What are common parameters to use when using Makeham's Law to model mortality in the real world?
- How do I scale my parabolas so that their integrals over [0,1] are always the same?
- Retrain of a neural network
Related Questions in TRANSITION-MATRIX
- Transition probabilities for many-states Markov model
- Markov Chain - find missing transition values
- Find the transition matrix $P_{S\leftarrow T}$
- A vector $\mathbf{x}\in X$ has coordinates $\mathbf{x}_\mathcal{B}= \langle2,-7,-10\rangle$. What is $\mathbf{x}_\mathcal{G}$?
- A vector $x∈X$ has coordinates $x_B=⟨2,−7,−10⟩$. What is $x_J$?
- transition rates from transition probabilities
- Trying to grasp how to compute a $n$-step transition probability
- Change of Basis Given 2 Vectors and Transition Matrix
- What is the difference between a transition function and a transition kernel?
- Markov chain constant transition matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are a few different things here that seem confusing!
(1) Although it may be plausible to model the whole system as a Markov chain, that doesn't mean that the "state" of each individual is Markov. (For example, thinking about the state of a single predator P1 alone: suppose you know that P1 is "alive" at some given time $t$; if you also know that they have already fought with P2 and with P3, then you know they will now live for ever. So the path we took to the current state could influence the future evolution, meaning that the process is not Markov.)
(2) If you "imagine that the fight is instantaneous in time" then you don't need states in which fights are occurring, since the chain never spends any time in those states.
(3) Something weird is going on with the way you're setting up your "transition matrix". Perhaps you're mixing together how things work in continuous time and in discrete time? It sounds like you're intending your "$\mathbf{P}$" to represent the transition matrix between times $0$ and $t$. But that matrix only seems to be taking into account the possibility of one jump during that time interval, whereas of course there could be several. To set things up in continuous time (as your title suggests you want to), you normally start with the jump rates, which give you your "$Q$-matrix" (or "generator") $Q$. Then the time-$t$ transition matrix is given by $P_t=e^{tQ}$.
So we could set up a chain whose states record which predators are alive at a given time. Say "123", "12", "13", "23", "1", "2", "3". According to your description, for every pair of predators alive, each kills the other at rates $\lambda/2$. So your chain has transitions:
Out of "123", each of the 3 possible transitions happens at rate $\lambda$, and out of "12", "13", "23", each of the 2 possible transitions happens at rate $\lambda/2$.
From this you could form your $Q$-matrix and take things from there. But in fact the chain is quite simple. The path will have precisely two jumps. It starts will all three predators alive. After an $\mathrm{Exp}(3\lambda)$-distributed time, it jumps to a state with two predators alive. Then after a further (independent) $\mathrm{Exp}(\lambda)$-distributed time, it jumps to a state with just one predator alive, and stays there for ever. So if you want to do calculations, it may be easier to do so using independent random variables $X\sim\mathrm{Exp}(3\lambda)$, $Y\sim\mathrm{Exp}(\lambda)$ rather than via the set-up with the $Q$-matrix.