Suppose $X\sim\mathsf{Bin}\left({18},\frac13\right)$ and $Y\sim\mathsf{Bin}\left({m},\frac13\right)$ independent random variables, compute: $$\displaystyle{ \lim_{m\to\infty}\mathbb{P}\left[X\leq t-Y\right] }$$while $t=\frac{m}{4}.$
I've set $Z=X+Y$ and then said that $Z$ is a sum of $m+18$ independent bernouli rv's with $p=\frac{1}{3}$ but then I've tried using the central limit theorem but since $t=\frac{m}{4}$ I cant get the thing inside the probability to look like $\frac{S_n-n\mu}{\sigma\sqrt{n}}\leq k$ for some $k$.
You have $$ \mathbb P(X+Y \leq t) = \mathbb P(Z_m \leq t) $$ where $Z_m = \mbox{Bin}(18+m,\frac 13)$ (in distribution) is a sum of $18+m$ independent Bernoulli random variables with parameter $p=\frac 13$.
In particular, $\mathbb EZ_m = 6+\frac{m}{3}$ and $\mbox{Var}(Z_m) = (18+m)\times \frac{1}{3} \times\frac{2}{3} = 4+\frac{2m}{9}$. Therefore, $$ \frac{Z_m - \mathbb EZ_m}{\sqrt{\mbox{Var}(Z_m)}} = \frac{Z_m - 6-\frac{m}{3}}{\sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}}} \to N(0,1) $$ in distribution, by the central limit theorem.
Let's do some "unrigorous" arithmetic. Roughly speaking, $$Z_m - 6-\frac{m}{3} \approx \sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}}N(0,1)= N\left(0,4+\frac{2m}{9}\right) \implies Z_m \approx N\left(6+\frac{m}{3},4+\frac{2m}{9}\right)$$
We want $\mathbb P(Z_m \leq \frac{m}{4})$, which we rewrite as $\mathbb P(\frac{4Z_m}{m} \leq 1)$. From the heuristics above, $$ Z_m \approx N\left(6+\frac{m}{3},4+\frac{2m}{9}\right) \implies \frac{4Z_m}{m} \approx N\left(\left(6+\frac{m}{3}\right)\times \frac{4}{m},\left(4+\frac{2m}{9}\right) \times \frac{16}{m^2}\right) $$ As $m \to \infty$, we observe that the mean converges to $\frac 43$ : but the variance converges to $0$. Hence, we are led to believe that $\frac{4Z_m}m \to \frac{4}{3}$, the constant random variable, in distribution. Can we prove this rigorously now? Obviously, the arguments above are not rigorous because the $\approx$ signs do not indicate any equality, but rather comparisons in some appropriate asymptotic sense that we have not quantified.
All this can be achieved by some simple manipulations. First, we multiply both top and bottom of the CLT left hand side by $\frac{4}{m}$. This leads to $$ \frac{\frac{4Z_m}{m} - \frac{24}{m} - \frac 43}{\frac{4}{m}\sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}}} \to N(0,1). $$ Observe that the sequence $\frac{4}{m}\sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}} \to 0$ as $m \to \infty$. Treating this as a sequence of constant random variables which are converging in probability to a constant and applying Slutsky's theorem(see the end of this answer), $$ \frac{\frac{4Z_m}{m} - \frac{24}{m} - \frac 43}{\frac{4}{m}\sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}}} \times \left(\frac{4}{m}\sqrt{4+\frac{2m}{9}}\right) \to N(0,1) \times 0 = 0 $$ in distribution. This is equivalent to $\frac{4Z_m}{m} - \frac{24}{m} - \frac 43 \to 0$ in distribution. However, we may apply Slutsky's theorem yet again. This time, the sequence of constant random variables $\frac{24}{m}+ \frac 43 \to \frac{4}{3}$ in probability. Hence, applying Slutsky's theorem $$ \frac{4Z_m}{m} - \frac{24}{m} - \frac 43 +\frac{24}{m}+ \frac 43 \to 0+\frac{4}{3} = \frac{4}{3}. $$ In particular, we have proved that $\frac{4Z_m}{m} \to \frac{4}{3}$ in distribution. From here, observe that the CDF of the constant random variable $\frac{4}{3}$ is continuous at the point $1$, therefore $$ \mathbb P\left(\frac{4Z_m}{m} \leq 1\right) \to \mathbb P\left(\frac 43 \leq 1\right) = 0, $$ concluding the proof.
Slutsky's theorem : If $X_n \to X$ in distribution and $Y_n \to Y$ in probability, where $Y$ is a (finite) constant random variable, then $X_nY_n \to XY$ and $X_n+Y_n \to X+Y$ in distribution. We used both versions above.