Given Bayesian network
can't understand the two last steps in
why the p(C=c|E=e,~H) can get out of the e sum?
and why sum p(E=e|A,S,~H) and sum p(C=c|E=e,~H) and been neglected?
Thank for the answer.
2026-03-26 04:28:25.1774499305
conditional probability question Given bayesian network could not understand solution given
338 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
It's not - it's just loose notation in that answer. Adding extra parentheses would be clearer, (though it should be understood by the appearance of $e$ in the inner sum) making the denominator in Line (4) read:
$$P(A)P(S)P(\neg H)\sum_e{[P(E=e\mid A,S,\neg H) \sum_c{P(C=c\mid E=e,\neg H)} ]}.$$
Because $\sum_c p(C=c|E=e,\neg H) = 1$ (because we're summing over all possible values of $C$).
Similarly, $\sum_e p(E=e|A,S,\neg H) = 1$ (because we're summing over all possible values of $E$).