This is a bijection $\pi$ between $\mathbb C^n$ and the set of monic polynomials of degree $n$ defined by \begin{align*} \pi(\alpha_{n-1}, \alpha_{n-2}, \dots, \alpha_0) = t^n + \alpha_{n-1} t^{n-1} + \dots + \alpha_0. \end{align*} Let \begin{align*} E = \{ \zeta \in \mathbb C^n: \text{All roots of }\pi(\zeta) \text{ have negative real parts}\}. \end{align*} By Vieta's formulas, we know $E$ is connected. Indeed, if we let $\Delta = \{z \in \mathbb C: \text{Re}(z) < 0\}$. Then $E$ is the image of $\underbrace{\Delta \times \Delta \times \dots \times \Delta}_{n \text{ times}}$ under a continuous function. I am wondering whether it is easy to construct some explicit path. That is, suppose we have $a = (a_{n-1}, \dots, a_0), b= (b_{n-1}, \dots, b_0) \in E$, can we construct a continuous path $\gamma: [0,1] \to E$ with $\gamma(0) = a$ and $\gamma(1)=b$ explicitly?
2026-03-25 11:12:07.1774437127
Constructing explicit connected path for coefficients of monic polynomials with roots lying in the open left half plane?
226 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in POLYNOMIALS
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Can $P^3 - Q^2$ have degree 1?
- System of equations with different exponents
- Can we find integers $x$ and $y$ such that $f,g,h$ are strictely positive integers
- Dividing a polynomial
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- Polyomial function over ring GF(3)
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- $x^{2}(x−1)^{2}(x^2+1)+y^2$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{C}[x,y].$
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Related Questions in PATH-CONNECTED
- Why the order square is not path-connected
- Prove that $\overline S$ is not path connected, where $S=\{x\times \sin(\frac1x):x\in(0,1]\}$
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- Example of a topological space that is connected, not locally connected and not path connected
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- Proof explanation to see that subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$ is not path connected.
- Connectedness and path connectedness of a finer topology
- Show that for an abelian countable group $G$ there exists a compact path connected subspace $K ⊆ \Bbb R^4$ such that $H_1(K)$ isomorphic to $G$
- Is there a better way - space is not path connected
- How to construct a path between two points in a general $n-surface$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $e_0, e_1, ... ,e_n$ denote the elementary symmetric polynomials in $n$ variables, we get a continuous map $$\sigma : \mathbb{C}^n \to \mathbb{C}^n, \sigma(\zeta) = (-e_1(\zeta), e_2(\zeta),...,(-1)^n e_n(\zeta)) .$$
You may interpret $\sigma(\zeta)$ as the coefficients of a monic polynomial $p_\zeta(z)$ of degree $n$ having as roots the components $z_i$ of $\zeta =(z_1,\ldots,z_n)$, where a root of multiplicity $k$ oocurs $k$-times in this sequence. In fact, $p_\zeta(z) = \pi(\sigma(\zeta)) = \prod_{i=1}^n(z-z_i)$ where $\pi$ was introduced in the question.
We have $E = \sigma(\Delta^n)$. This means that the set $E$ could alternatively be defined without reference to monic polynomials and their roots. Let $s : \Delta^n \to E$ denote the restriction.
Now it depends on what you understand by "explicitly construct some path from $a$ to $b$". You find $a', b' \in \Delta^n$ such that $s(a') = a, s(b') = b$. Define $u : [0,1] \to \Delta^n, u(t) = (1-t)a' + tb'$. This is a path connecting $a'$ and $b'$, therefore $s \circ u$ is a path connecting $a$ and $b$. However, it is not obvious how to find $a',b'$. There is no general method to express $a',b'$ as a function of $a,b$ and in that sense $a',b'$ cannot be made explicit (if you could, you would have a solution formula for polynomials of arbitrary degree $n$ which in fact only exists for $n \le 4$).
Let us finally consider the map $\sigma$. For each $\eta \in \mathbb{C}^n$ the inverse image $\sigma^{-1}(\eta)$ consists of all $\zeta = (z_1,....z_n)$ such that the $\{ z_1,....z_n \}$ is the set of all roots of $\pi(\eta)$. Hence $\sigma$ is surjective. Moreover, the symmetric group $S_n$ of $n$ elements operates by permutation of coordinates on $\mathbb{C}^n$; the fibres $\sigma^{-1}(\eta)$ agree with the orbits of this operation. Therefore $\sigma$ induces a bijection $\sigma': \mathbb{C}^n/S_n \to \mathbb{C}^n$.
We show that $\sigma$ is a closed map. It is known that $\max\{1, \lvert a_{n-1} \rvert, ... , \lvert a_0 \rvert \} = \lVert(1,a_{n-1},\ldots,a_0) \rVert_\infty$ is an upper bound for the abolute values of the roots of $z^n + a_{n-1}z^{n+-1} + ... + a_1z + a_0$ (Cauchy's bound). This implies that $\sigma^{-1}(B)$ is bounded if $B \subset \mathbb C^n$ is bounded. Now let $A \subset \mathbb{C}^n$ be closed and $(\eta_m)$ be a sequence in $\sigma(A)$ converging to some $\eta \in \mathbb{C}^n$. Then $Y = \{ \eta_m \mid m \in \mathbb{N} \}$ is bounded, hence $Z = \sigma^{-1}(Y)$ is bounded. Choose $\zeta_m \in A$ such that $\sigma(\zeta_m) = \eta_n$. Since $\zeta_m \in Z$, we see that $(\zeta_m)$ is a bounded sequence and has a convergent subsequence with limit $\zeta$. Since $A$ is closed, $\zeta \in A$. By continuity of $\sigma$ we conclude $\eta \in \sigma(A)$.
This implies that $\sigma$ is an identification map. Therefore, if we give $\mathbb{C}^n/S_n$ the quotient topology induced by the canonical quotient function $\mathbb{C}^n \to \mathbb{C}^n/S_n$, we see that $\sigma'$ is a homeomorphism.