The statement of this problem asks to show that if $A$ and $B$ are two distinct convex $n$-gons there is a continous family of convex $n$-gons such that the first in that family is $A$ and the last is $B$. My first intuition is that convexity ought to be utilized at some point in this proof. Perhaps consider establishing a correspondence between the vertices and drawing the line segment in between. Then continuously translate the $n$-gon along the lines. Shape will clearly not be preserved but I think there is a way to do this preserving convexity. It is just not clear to me under which conditions this translation should be performed. Any thoughts?
2026-04-01 05:12:00.1775020320
Continous family of $n$-gons
54 Views Asked by user310648 https://math.techqa.club/user/user310648/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in CONVEX-ANALYSIS
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Convex open sets of $\Bbb R^m$: are they MORE than connected by polygonal paths parallel to the axis?
- Show that this function is concave?
- In resticted domain , Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality
- Area covered by convex polygon centered at vertices of the unit square
- How does positive (semi)definiteness help with showing convexity of quadratic forms?
- Why does one of the following constraints define a convex set while another defines a non-convex set?
- Concave function - proof
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- compact convex sets
Related Questions in PLANE-GEOMETRY
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- Line coordinates from plane intersection
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- Perfect Pascal Mysticum Points
- Intersection of a facet and a plane
- Proving formula to find area of triangle in coordinate geometry.
- Prove that the intersection of a cylinder and a plane forms an ellipse
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
- Composite of two rotations with different centers
- Can a plane be perpendicular in two other planes if those planes are not parallel to each other?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For 3-gons one can consider the circumcircle, and move points along the circle until it is equilateral, without going through nonconvex 3-gons (since there are none). Since both 3-gons can be thus made into equilaterals, a composition of the two deformations takes the first into the second.
Suppose true for $n$ gons, and consider two $n+1$ gons, and take three adjacent vertices $a,b,c$ from one of them and $a',b',c'$ from the other. For each of these, one can move $b$ (and $b'$) until it coincides with the midpoint of $ac$ or $a'c',$ without destroying convexity. (E.g. move it on the line connecting $b$ to the midpoint of $ac.$)
Now you have essentially two $n$ gons and can finish by the inductive hypothesis.