I was reading notion of convergence in random variables and I am not sure if I understood them correctly. According to Wikipedia, for sequence of random variables $X_1,X_2,...$, almost sure convergence means $P(\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}X_n = X)=1$ which is same as $P(\omega \in \Omega : lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} X_n(\omega) = X(\omega))= 1 $. Now as random variables are function from sample space to $R$, then it seems almost sure convergence means that we have pointwise convergence of functions($X_n$'s to $X$'s) except for may be at sets of measure zero? Now I can see how this implies convergence in distribution but how about random variable $Y=lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}X_n$ and $X$, can we say $Y=X$? I can not see how this is true. Because although we have same functions(random variables), underlying randomness(which could be different for Y and X) could generate different $\omega$'s which could then be mapped by $Y$ and $X$ to different values in $R$. Also if this is not true then how is almost sure convergence different from convergence in distribution? Can we have some non-trivial example where the limiting random variable is not constant. I don't have mathematics background so please try to avoid measure theoretic language and sorry for the long and confusing post. Thanks a lot in advance.
2026-03-30 20:52:38.1774903958
Convergence of random varaible?
99 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-LIMIT-THEOREMS
- weak limit similiar to central limit theorem
- What is the name of the method or process when a system is evaluated against the highest degree terms?
- Law of large numbers and a different model for the average of IID trials
- Prove that regression beta of order statistics converges to 1?
- Random variable convergence question
- How does this sequence of distributions converge?
- Determine limit distribution
- Relation between (non-random) Big O and probability little o
- How to derive approximation result from Levy 0-1 law?
- binomial normal with dependent success probability
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $Y$ is another limit with probability $1$ then $X =Y$ with probability $1$, that is $P(X\not = Y)=0$, that is, there is a subset of $\Omega$ whose probability is $0$ and if we omit this set then we can say that $X(\omega)=Y(\omega)$ for all $\omega$ (not in that set).
As far as the relationship between the two concept of convergence. Take a specific example over $\Omega=[0,1]$. Let the probability measure be uniform (fined by the length). Consider $X(\omega)=\omega$. This is going to be the limiting random variable. And define the $X_n$s as functions from $[0,1]$ to $R$ the following "walking" way. First divide $[0,1]$ into four subintervals: $[0,1/4],(1/4,1/2],(1/2,3/4],(3/4,1]$. Let $X_1=0$ over $[0,1/4]$ and $\omega$ otherwise. Let $X_2=0$ over $(1/4,1/2]$ and $\omega$ otherwise and so on. Then halve these intervals and define $X_5=0$ over $[0,1/8]$ and $\omega$ otherwise. Then let the abyss "walk" through the $8$ intervals.
The figure below depicts $X_{10}$ and $X_{11}$ the $10$th and the $11$th elements of this walking abyss.
Then halve the current intervals and let walk the next series the similar way. Then halve again. Now, you are going to have narrower and narrower abysses walking through the interval $[0,1]$. The probability that $X_n=\omega$ is getting larger and larger because the interval over which $X_n$ is $0$ is getting narrower and narrower. So, this is convergence in distribution to $X=\omega$. Do we have convergence with probability $1$? No! Because for any $\omega$ there will be always an $n$ for which the slimmer and slimmer walking abyss will make $X_n=0$ for that $\omega$. What is more, $P(\lim X_n(\omega)=\omega)=0$.